mikem said:Quoting the entire previous post when replying - if it's been superceded by others then fair enough, but even then it helps if any irrelevant parts are deleted.
Minion said:mikem said:Quoting the entire previous post when replying - if it's been superceded by others then fair enough, but even then it helps if any irrelevant parts are deleted.
I agree, it?s just sheer laziness.
Minion said:mikem said:Quoting the entire previous post when replying - if it's been superceded by others then fair enough, but even then it helps if any irrelevant parts are deleted.
I agree, it?s just sheer laziness.
JoshW said:Minion said:mikem said:Quoting the entire previous post when replying - if it's been superceded by others then fair enough, but even then it helps if any irrelevant parts are deleted.
I agree, it?s just sheer laziness.
Horrendous isn't it, just use the relevant bit.
Fortunately it doesn't really bother me with short posts... :tease:mudman said:JoshW said:Minion said:mikem said:Quoting the entire previous post when replying - if it's been superceded by others then fair enough, but even then it helps if any irrelevant parts are deleted.
I agree, it?s just sheer laziness.
Horrendous isn't it, just use the relevant bit.
Doesn't it depend on which bit is relevant? What if there are lots of relevant bits that are relevant? After all, relevance it relative.
That's why that was just an aside. The main comment was quoting something in entirety that appears just above.PeteHall said:To be fair, for anyone using the forum form a mobile phone, it is really tedious to remove parts of a quote and very easy to loose the bits you wanted to keep. Then you have no choice but to start again or give up