racingsnake said:
With the exception of the usual crap spouted by the narrator good prog. Using companions rope with a shunt for extra protection would seem awkward for all us SRT kings but remember these people are first timers on a fcuking big hole so you can't blame Tim for wanting them to have a little protection imagin trying to lifeline them !!!!! that would be 4 ropes
It would only be two ropes if they went down one at a time, thats the point... I've done the "two on a hang" thing many times, but I know (!?) what I'm doing. If these were TRULY novices and then
a) A 100m+ hang to an unknown landing is foolhardy
b) Two of them on the hang is unnecessary and foolhardy
One should have one guy on the hang, and maybe a second rope down in case you have to go and sort them out.....
Consider a rock comes off and knock out the lower of the two guys....just what are you going to do.....the second novice then makes that a much bigger problem.
Consider the top novice goes a bit too far down, and his shunt "locks". Realeasing it with the other rope tensioned by the lower person is gonna be hard
"Double line" safety can be obtained easier by simply putting a double rope down, using a descender that takes a double rope (eg a rack) and having your shunt in hand on the double rope ABOVE the descender (Just like in the pertzl manual!!).
Advantages are
a) No risk of "spinning" twisting the two sepearated rope
b) Double/Double safety The ab is on both ropes AND the safety device is on both ropes
c) The person isn't leaning out in an awkward position trying to work the shunt down on an untensioned rope....tiring for a novice and means a lot longer in the harness.
All told this looked like rope silliness to me, with making good footage taking priority over sensible safety measures.