A Danger of Freediving Sumps

sumpicide

New member
I'm writing this as a warning to anyone considering freediving the Swildon's sumps, but may not have really appreciated the risks involved. On previous trips to Swildon's 4 and 9, myself and others had exercised great caution regarding Sumps 2, 3 and 4 and used to be concerned that we would find them silty/impassable (especially in dry weather). All of these previous trips, however, we had found each sump roomy and pleasant, and gradually convinced ourselves that the stories we had heard of cavers bailing out silt mid-dive was exaggerated, or for some reason no danger to us.

After two days of dry weather after Storm Claudia, a small group including myself decided to do a trip through the first few sumps. A few weeks ago the water levels had been extremely low, and now unsurprisingly the cave was a gushing river of whitewater. Sump 1 was no longer a duck but a deep scummy pool, and I noticed it felt slightly tighter than it had ever felt before (I'm on the thin side), requiring a good few hard tugs on the line to get through to Swildon's 2. This should have been the first warning sign that we would encounter problems in later sumps - the fact that we'd only ever worried about silt because of dry conditions mistakenly lead me to dismiss this.

With a mask and hood on, I lay in the Sump 2 pool and took a deep breath in. The visibility was poor, but the sump seemed as wide and roomy as it had always felt before. About 7 metres into the sump, I encounter the lowered ceiling, meaning I was close to the airbell. However, it was at this same point I noticed the floor level rising due to a large sediment deposit. I soon find my chest wedged between the ceiling and the floor - hard tugs on the line get me no further through the sump. I put my hand in front of me and feel the rope running through a gap only a few inches wide, with the floor a thick sediment bed - the visibility turned from poor to none. At this point I decide that to try and push through would be suicidal - even more so considering that the high water levels means that there may not be air for another several metres after the constriction. I managed to use the line to manoeuvre backwards out of the constriction, until I was free enough to flip my hands around on the line and attempt to reverse the significant distance I had covered so far. A mistake whilst performing this, or a delay in deciding to, could have had fatal consequences. Emerging back out of the upstream end, I was panting and significantly more out of breath than I had ever found myself from Sump 3. We turned around and made a prompt exit, losing only a glove.

Before the trip, myself and my peers had lead ourselves into a false security of thinking we understood how weather events correspond to the hydrology of the cave. We did not understand this then, nor do we now, and should have recognised that neither dry nor wet weather is a simple guarantee of the sumps being passable or impassable. I suppose that the gushing water through the cave picked up more sediment than usual from higher levels - when this sediment reaches the later sumps, where the pools are larger, the velocity of the flow decreases and leads to increased deposition. The lowering of the ceiling in Sump 2 limits the flow of water further, maximising deposition, which is potentially why I only encountered significant silting at that point. This is not to say that to dive these sumps in other (or even any) conditions would be safe, nor that this theory is correct.

I cannot offer any comforting advice to anyone who wishes to freedive sumps, but would urge you to consider whether you would dive into one knowing that you may have to turn around at the very end, or find yourself stuck in a constriction you could not navigate?
 
Thanks for sharing this. An important lesson. I may go and have a look/ dig it out on Saturday.

Largely irrelevant in the context, but with the shape of the airbell roof/wall, Sump 2 is unlikely to be longer than usual at the downstream end, even if it's deeper. Same is basically true at the upstream end, except that in very low flow conditions there is often a long but generally unusable airspace.
 
A high water event after a long period without any others is more likely to wash material into a sump than out of it. If it's been high enough to wash majority of available material in, then subsequent events will start to wash stuff out.
 
I've spent a fair amount of my life in underwater caves and I can confirm that, in active sumps, sediments are continually moving. Silt banks appear and disappear continually over time. Dive logs in CDG Newsletters frequently refer to folk having to re-excavate areas which were previously passable with ease. This is one reason why cave diving is safer than free diving, provided the necessary techniques have been learned; when diving on air there's time to sort problems out. I think the OP is absolutely right to flag up the problem encountered, especially in a popular place like Swildons.
 
Interesting. Thanks for the information. The only time I have been to look at the first sump, with the intention to go through it, I measured the available space with my forearm and judged it much tighter (between the floor and the roof) than I had been led to believe. So I didn't do it. I mentioned it to a few people since then and they all dismissed me as being wrong and having misjudged the size, but perhaps I was right after all.
 
Well,.......you only lost a glove, nothing important eh??

I suggest reading the Swildon's hole book and see Oliver Lloyd's reaction to Robin from the A.W.R.E. Caving club, having freedived sumps 1 & 2 in the early 1960's.
 
Reading this, It seems I am right to listen to my fear and avoid free diving sumps, unless I can feel the air on the other side. Glad you are okay.
 
Perhaps it's worth mentioning aother aspect; if sediment has accumulated on a slope it's potentially even more dangerous, as it can easily slump. Sadly, this exact scenario led to a fatality a few years ago at the Dragonniere (France). The cave diver involved was well equipped and very experienced. In a free diving situation this sort of event could easily have the worst consequences.

Another factor to be aware of is that in sumps with mobile sediments the guidline can become buried and unfollowable.

A case in point is Treasury Sump in Peak Cavern. The Peak end starts as a steep slope down into the water where the level of the mobile gravel varies enormously, on a sharp bend. It frequently slumps when disturbed; no great problem when you're starting with a gap of over a metre but a very different situation when it's body sized. (I confess to having free dived through Treasury Sump myself but only after having gone through on air a day or two beforehand, since the preceding flood event, allowing it to be checked.) I can recall a certain well planned trip into Speedwell via this route when, of eight experienced cave divers, only four of us actually made it through.

I should make it clear that my advice is DON'T try to free dive through Treasury Sump; I only decided to do it because I'm very familiar with the underwater terrain and how it changes regularly. It's sometimes a dangerous place even for fully equipped cave divers.

Free diving can be an exhilarating experience but there's no margin for error or unforeseen conditions.
 
Perhaps it's worth mentioning aother aspect; if sediment has accumulated on a slope it's potentially even more dangerous, as it can easily slump.
Sidcot U-tube (another Swildon's free-dive) apparently suffers from a similar problem, though it is static, so if you're careful, at least thd first person through can get a look at it. I've never seen it slumped and blocked, but judging by the loose mud bank beyond, I can see the danger! It can also be bailed, but requires a few people to do, so not always am option.
 
Given the tech available these days would a tiny, tethered submersible with a camera be a possibility? It might allow a look-see before committing to a dive. Or would that be considered 'unsporting'?
 
Thanks for sharing.

I've often experienced a reluctance among divers (and climbers) to share their lessons learnt. It's a real shame when that happens because it's such valuable information for others. Sharing sets an example to others and has a bigger effect that just the specific issue involved.

So thanks - Glad you're alive and took the time to share.
 
Given the tech available these days would a tiny, tethered submersible with a camera be a possibility? It might allow a look-see before committing to a dive. Or would that be considered 'unsporting'?

I think a small bottle and a regulator would be much better thing to be carrying than a drone and it's associated display kit.

Personally, I don't think there should be any 'sport' in free diving sumps. It's a very convenient shortcut that some people may use to avoid a carry and speed everything up, but doing it for the thrill is not for me.
 
I think a small bottle and a regulator would be much better thing to be carrying than a drone and it's associated display kit.

Personally, I don't think there should be any 'sport' in free diving sumps. It's a very convenient shortcut that some people may use to avoid a carry and speed everything up, but doing it for the thrill is not for me.
Agree that a drone is a waste of time and diving it with kit would be a much better alternative.

Disagree entirely on not free-diving for sport. It's all a matter of calculated risk, just like any other type of caving. By your logic, you shouldn't do any caving for sport.

Free-diving opens up all sorts of trip opportunities for all cavers, whether or not they own, or know how to use diving equipment. It's not just about "speeding everything up" or "avoiding a carry". Most cavers don't dive and many free-diving trips would not be viable or enjoyable carrying kit. Would you carry a bottle (or a pair?) up the hill to do a Rowten through-trip? Would you carry a bottle (or pair?) to do the Short Round Trip in Swildon's? Would you discard half most of Swildon's if you were a non-diver?

And more to the point, free-diving sumps can be really enjoyable and rewarding.

Regarding Sump 2 in Swildon's, it's looking like I'll be going Sunday now, rather than Saturday. I've not decided yet whether to take any kit, or make a first inspection on a free-dive. The passage is quite wide, so there's a good chance of finding a route into the airbell, then digging the silt bank from the other side. If it's not possible to get through, it would be possible to go down Blue Pencil and approach from downstream, or otherwise return with diving kit.
 
I'm assuming anyone who used a cylinder & DV to pass a shump has learned some basic safety aspects, in particular the importance of not inadvertently holding your breath whilst ascending.
I'm led to believe that a burst lung is fairly bad for morale . . . .

Just saying.
 
Interesting discussion. Not being a great breath holder and having scuba dived from an early age (14) I have always been wary of free diving an unknown sump even one regularly free dived. Having been through Swildons sumps with a bottle I found sump 4 quite constricted and Sump 3 requires a deep dive down to avoid hitting the roof on the way through (incidentally nobody could pass 3 with diving gear on the original assaults suggesting that at that time it might have been silted up) There is quite a good monograph by Dave Irwin on Sumps 2 and 3 and the history behind their exploration. My preference for a free dive I would contemplate is one in which the water is clear, relatively shallow and spacious. The one time I dived Sump 2 was 50 years ago on a freezing day in early January. I went with my father to ensure I could pass a free diveable sump in Chiker Cave in Morocco later that year. I noted ' the sump is 30' long with a bulge at the far end which one tends to hit if you're going too fast. No casualties.' I did do the free dive in Chiker but that is another story. The lesson that sumps alter depending on water flow was brought forcibly home to us exploring a Moroccan system where from year to year parts of the cave would be choked by silt (one changed 3 times over visits 2 years apart each time).
 
My preference for a free dive I would contemplate is one in which the water is clear, relatively shallow and spacious.
I think you would enjoy the Rowten sumps when the weather is right @mrodoc . I had crystal clear visibility last time I was there (March this year), without a doubt the best I've ever seen it, making the free-dives an absolute pleasure! The sumps are wide and shallow with a cobble floor, though there is a risk of debris washed in from the surface, so care is obviously still required.
 
As of about 16.30 yesterday afternoon, Swildon’s Sump 1, 2, 3 and 4 were clear and open for free-diving.

Sump 2 had a bit of a sand bank running along the length of the sump, parallel to the dive line. With the line in the right hand (as is recommended), the diver is naturally on the left of the sand bank, and as such, there were no issues passing the sump. Had the line been held in the left hand and the diver following the righthand wall, it is possible that the diver would become trapped between the cave wall and the aforementioned sand bank.

All other sumps were passed without issue, however the free-dive bypass to Sump 5 was not looking sensible with the current water levels.
 
Back
Top