Another pinion...

droid

Active member
Simon Wilson said:
A bloke with no training in law disagrees with a legal opinion written by one of the most eminent lawyers in the country... :LOL:

Yet again you don't read the posts properly, RE the information supplied to said 'one of the most eminent lawyers in the country'.....
 

droid

Active member
Badlad...can I guess who one of the raving pro-crowers' is?

:LOL: :LOL: :LOL:

On a personal note: I'm a scientist by training. Trained to look at verifiable data and propose arguments from that. Personalities don't come into it.

I'd be asking the same questions regarding information and its sources if I was in favour of CRoW. In fact I'm pretty neutral regarding CRoW.

An Opinion of whatever source based on biased information is a biased Opinion, regardless of the origins of that Opinion.
 

Alex

Well-known member
We have to put up with one blooming referendum result (Britexit) so it's only fair that we get this one too, and it's with a much bigger majority ;)
 

droid

Active member
Fulk: finally sussed what you were saying. Here's my reply.

droid said:
Let's get one thing straight.

I'm not saying there wasn't effort put in to the submission.

What I'm saying is submissions from the 'anti groups' - not mediated by 'pro groups' - were noticeable by their absence.
 

crickleymal

New member
Chocolate fireguard said:
crickleymal said:
Do we really have to go round this never ending loop again?
I think that's a very negative attitude!
Can't work out whether you're joking or not. How I am being negative in not wanting to read the same old arguments and threats trotted out time and time again?
 

Chocolate fireguard

Active member
Sorry.

I know nowadays you're supposed to use one of those mojo things to show exactly how something is meant, but I never remember to do it.

See my reply #1 right at the start of this thread.
 

droid

Active member
Don't fret lads.

Once the BMC realise they're flogging a dead horse all this will be carefully forgotten  :LOL:
 
Top