Unfortunately not sure if Tata would be greatly persuaded by that, because they can just mothball UK and produce steel in other regionsal said:
"Apparently neither British Steel nor Tata want this coal because of impurities"
They might change their minds if future geopolitical deterioration produces a situation whereby there is no other option.
So how do you feel about the Royal Institution of Great Britain?I'm going to struggle to take their output seriously when their director was a revolutionary communist!Science Media Centre - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
Chris
Both heat and chemical. It’s still not so straightforward to make high grade steel without it. All of the stuff I used to buy is made with coke still.I thought coking coal was used as a chemical input to the steelmaking process, so not burned at all?
Chris.
I'm a bit puzzled by the reference to it having too much sulphur, the whole point of the coking process is to remove sulphur, so that in the partial burn of a blast furnace, you only get carbon monoxide generated and no/negligible sulphur dioxide.Both heat and chemical. It’s still not so straightforward to make high grade steel without it. All of the stuff I used to buy is made with coke still.