Large expedition tackle bags: Overview and info

AlexR

Active member
My caving has changed from predominantly one day trips hanging off rope, stooping and crawling through foul places, to lugging a metric ton of kit through an "underground mountaineering" cave for 1-1.5 days before the real fun starts.
None of the tackle sacks I own were particularly suitable for this. For a bit I got away with putting all the heavy items into my 35L bag with my team mates taking more voluminous, less heavy stuff. This was bad because a) it meant I was carrying 20kg without a hip belt, and b) once the cave gets smaller I couldn't convince others my heavier weight bag was a fair exchange for them having to brutalise a larger bag through constrictions.

IMG_20250819_112451.jpg

MTDE 60L on left, self made 35L Dyneema bag on right


I've looked at, and tested where available, the AV, Landjoff, Petzl and MTDE bags.

The below might be useful to anyone looking to buy an exped size bag - my original bag is ~35L, which covers food for 5 days, bolt climbing kit, rudimentary 1st aid/ shelter and camp clothing, but reaches its limit when I have to take a sleeping bag or additional rope as well. So I was looking for something in the region of 50-60L. I don't think a bag like this has any use in UK caving, hence why I never used to own one. Scandalously I haven't considered Warmbac as they're difficult to come by on the continent and at any rate are very heavy. That also makes them the longest-lasting and arguably best-built tackle bags.

Petzl Transport 60:
I'm a bit put off by recent quality issues and general direction Petzl is taking. In line with this, the bag seems more suitable for rope access and less so for dragging it through a cave. But they are very comfortable.

Landjoff Speleo 56:
A good bag in principle, unfortunately it's much closer to 40L than 56L in reality. So I'd see this as an excellent alternative to the Petzl Transport 45L.

AV Comfort 60:
The volume on this is about right, and it feels like a bag actually made for caving. At nearly 2kg empty weight it's quite chunky, which may translate to a longer life span. In my experience the design of the AV bag bottoms are prone to wearing out quite quickly; in rifts I often like to clip a bag to my belt and drag it through upright rather than carry it over one shoulder. That puts a lot of wear on the bottom corner. Seems to be a popular bag with divers.

MTDE Sherpa 60:
The bag I settled on, so inherently the one I can say the most about. It is a lot lighter than the AV (about 600g); the one used by Axel in the image above has seen a lot of action and is still going, so I wasn't too concerned about longevity. I've carried 20kg (weighed, not guessed) for 2 days in a cave and would say it's as comfortable as 20kg will ever be.
One of the reasons I bought it was the very large top handle, this has proven extremely useful when hoiking the bag through constrictions. The oval shape of these bags means orientation through smaller bits of cave is quite important; at least the shape is comparable to your body so you know how you'll want to orientate it. For this I've found the handle on the MTDE best for twisting the bag into the ideal position without too much fuss - I don't know if it's obvious what I mean by that; if you have a handle where both ends are fixed to the bag close together it's difficult to exert torque, a longer, stiff handle makes it easier.
The material given on the website is PVC, but I think the current interation is actually PU, which would be a good thing. All seams are thermally welded, not stitched. I have added a sternum strap, which I'd recommend for extended carrying.

Annoyingly, none of the above bags have a gear loop at the front to give a plumb hang, when you're on a rope they're all lopsided. This can be an issue even in constricted/ awkward horizontal passages but is normally useful (the bag orientates itself so you're not dragging the back facing side through the slop), it is however absolutely shit when on a rope in rifts - the bag will forever cam itself across the passage. I'm planning to sewing a loop onto the front but haven't gotten round to it yet. Then again, taking this kind of bag through constricted cave will have you seriously question your life choices.

Overall I recommend using a smaller tackle sack and getting others to carry your stuff :censored:
I have purposefully omitted prices as they're all within £30 or so of each other and I really wouldn't make my choice based on that. Let's put it this way, I never found myself thinking "if only I'd saved those £20 on xyz" down a cave, but I have had moments of "why was I such a bloody cheapskate".

Hope this proves helpful to someone at some point, probably even more so if people add their own experiences.
 
I would add that while MTDE bags are generally nice, the sizing is usually very optimistic. The 60l Sherpa is a nice bag but I don't think it's 60l (mind you I think you'd need a *very* nice cave for that to not be an outrageous big bag). I think it's *slightly* bigger than the old Petzl Transport (which was only 45l originally). I've not actually seen a new Petzl Transport 60l; I assume it's enormous.

I also reckon the Sherpa's fairly lightweight material is less tough than the old Petzl Transport but it isn't really intended to be a bag to be dragged through horrible horrible places (better with more smaller bags for that sort of thing). I'm pretty happy with my Sherpa for cave camping in mostly walking caves.
 
I've always used (and still use) my trusty 45l Sherpa bag from AV. I find it big enough for multi days trips and transport above ground.

AV Sherpa

Bigger is possible but is harder in usage in narrower passages. When transporting large amounts underground I prefer to use two bags. During walking a second standard petzl bag with fe 120m rope in can be strapped on the sherpa. When crawling both bags are move seperatly. Y

Classic sherpa 22L
 
With reviews, please can I ask if people can say if a Daren Drum fits or not, probably helpful info for many. Hopefully yes for a large expedition bag, but if a no it'd be useful to find out before buying
 
With this sort of size bag, the question is more whether you can get two Daren drums in the bottom at once, or can put a Daren drum on its side at the bottom :)

That said Daren drums are good for getting fragile things that must stay dry underground, but for Alpine expedition caving (or anything where you need to carry a lot of gear) I think they are not very useful because they take up a lot of space in the bag for not so much space on the inside (which is also hard to pack). They are also quite a good way of wearing holes in your bag (since they are hard), and rock + fabric + hard drum = hole.

For the Alpine caving in the Dachstein at least (both ends of the Hirlatzhöhle), you aren't expecting to get wet so one layer of drybag is sufficient. Packing something like a phone inside clothes or a sleeping bag/mat is normally then sufficient protection. Going somewhere like Daren I'd want double drybags (one of them being a tougher drybag, and no sharp/hard/pointy things inside the drybag unless packed carefully) although it's been a while since I went camping in there.

Trying to get a big (1.6 kg? but excitingly warm) sleeping bag into one of these bags is a pain though, as if you stuff it into a drybag at the bottom of the tackle sack it takes up the right shape (good) but doesn't get as compressed (bad), and if you stuff it into its compression sack or a smaller drybag outside of the tackle sack then it takes up about 2/3 the width and the bottom and it is very hard to efficiently pack stuff into the remaining gap. My recent Hirlatz bag (MTDE Sherpa) was only 18 kg but I couldn't quite get the SRT kit in and it was awkwardly stuffed under the lid.

One further (minor) complaint - the MTDE Sherpa lid-closing straps are only just long enough, so you struggle to stuff a load of extra crap that you shouldn't have brought underneath the lid if the bag is over-full :P
 
I would add that while MTDE bags are generally nice, the sizing is usually very optimistic.
Absolutely, I forgot to add that. Though the 60L Sherpa is arguably the best at hitting true to size, I would estimate 55L, 50L at an absolute minimum. Their smaller bags are egregiously off, the 30L is more like 20L. I have no idea what would posses MTDE to give these numbers, even just using the measurements on their website one can calculate that their volumes cannot be accurate.
Bigger is possible but is harder in usage in narrower passages.
Always a question of the cave you're in, but I absolutely would not want to take the MTDE Sherpa through anything resembling a narrow cave. On the flipside some types of alpine caving necessitate the carrying of very large amounts of kit - these are not luxury items, but simply what is needed for exploration at the end, with volume and weight already trimmed down as far as possible (though not in Andrew's case, I have incriminating photo evidence of this :p). I've used the two tackle sack method in the past, and whilst it has its pros there are also downsides, mainly when it comes to carrying them on your back for longer time periods. Inherently for every cave and caver there exists an individual solution.

With reviews, please can I ask if people can say if a Daren Drum fits or not, probably helpful info for many. Hopefully yes for a large expedition bag, but if a no it'd be useful to find out before buying
I'd love to, problem is the only one I ever owned I swiftly kicked down a cave as a carbide drying tub (muddy metalware and carbide goes in, clean-ish metalware comes out). Other than that you wouldn’t find me taking a Daren Drum if my life depended on it.
Ok, so that's deliberately polemic, but other than transporting a DSLR I cannot think of any justification for taking one. They are a major headache for getting your bag stuck as well as putting holes in it. People vastly overestimate how delicate things like Disto or drill really are. Anything that is designed for a construction site is not engineered with delicate handling in mind.
 
Currently my "big bag" (fnaaar) is a Warmbac 200m rope capacity double-shoulder-strapper (my 2nd to date) and it's GREAT for carrying heavy mass gear to relatively remote places but would be a TOTALPIG[tm] for any kind of narrow stuff. The solution (as I saw it) was to commission Warmbac to make me bespoke bags (no additional cost for this, btw - but maybe that is because they love me!) for deeper trips; the classic riggers' bag was to elongate their 120m kidney shaped bag to create around 150-180m capacity while retaining the double clip-on lugs at the top so that while rigging it wasn't hanging off a donkeydick/cowstail and whirling around into an impossible spiral* which meant zero rope would come out of the bag - instead, it was laterally clipped with each lug to my harness belt so it kept alignment with my body (riggers should know exactly what I mean by this), the bag also retained double (removable) shoulder straps for surface carrying. It had additional width for a lower profile on my back so it was less needful to remove it for stooping/sideways passages. Worked like a treat for my applications and I only ever needed the one-off. However, it was a fabulous piece of kit, effectively an over-sized (slender, wide and long, rather than chunky, fat and squat) bag. It was great. I commissioned it for the Berger (blatant name-dropping/bragging). There might be a photo of it somewhere (but I'll be in it so will spare the audience from the shameless and eye-squinting gurning that I was/am famous for).

* Anyone who still does this deserves zero sympathy, imo.
 
I do wish Warmbac would stop quoting bag sizes in metres of rope because it doesn't mean anything to me... what diameter rope?
I think I can get around 200m of 9mm rope into an old Petzl Transport 45l. Samouse1 recently said he could get 60m of 7mm Caving Line into a 6l Daren drum. On the other hand, I have no idea how much 11mm rope you can get into a given bag.

A bag full of 11mm rope is lighter than a bag containing 9mm rope because there is a lot more air in the bag, so the amount of extra rope you can pack in at smaller diameters is more than just the difference in weight per metre and is quite significant.
 
Should be yards of rope/bag to get into proper imperial units...

Preferences are different- I always take a small 6 Liter Darren drum in my expedition sack which doubles as cutting board, isolated seat and for many other purposes. In my experience it's more important how the bag is packed and to a lesser extent wheter the load is rigid or not.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top