More AI Generated Crap on Facebook

I blame the Facebork idiots publicly posting pics of Paris (approx 1.4 million human remains) for fueling that sort of nonsense. Whereas the cataphiles themselves had been discrete.
 
How about some AI generated carp instead?
1775824750329.jpeg
 
As a way to make a living its relatively harmless. Its much less anti social than the makers of vapes. the only way is Essex and nuclear weapons.

Its not doing me any harm so let em get on with it
 
Badlad said:
What are the little labels on the left and right. I can't make them out.
Click to expand...
Just used some super powerful experimental internet software tool (provided by Yorkshire internet tech giants B4RN, which is called 'A-up', rather than AI), and the small labels by the skeletons say 'Bury these Epstein problems with the other skeletons, where nobody can find them'.
 
Nothing against the actual photos its the textual content thats often misleading. If its AI fine if you say so as it can be quite artistic. Pretending its real is something else.
 
Moderator comment: Can we please return discussion on "AI Slop" if you wish in this 'Film & Photography" section of the Forum and stop adding to the "AI Slop" itself.
 
darren said:
As a way to make a living its relatively harmless. Its much less anti social than the makers of vapes. the only way is Essex and nuclear weapons.

Its not doing me any harm so let em get on with it
Click to expand...
But it is doing harm. Some people are still believing every "photograph" they see, others are so shocked by the realism of some AI that they're not believing anything. Both groups are being either misinformed or not informed, and that affects their decision making and ultimately the foundations of democracy.
 
kay said:
But it is doing harm.
Click to expand...
It's also stealing the creativity and hard work of artists. There's a friend of mine (and caver) who does incredibly detailed artwork, often of pets, with every hair drawn by hand. Now reproducible at will with no effort.
 
kay said:
But it is doing harm. Some people are still believing every "photograph" they see, others are so shocked by the realism of some AI that they're not believing anything. Both groups are being either misinformed or not informed, and that affects their decision making and ultimately the foundations
Click to expand...
Interesting use of the word "their". Obviously not including you, just other more stupid people?
I think of myself as pretty average, certainly not more informed or better than others.
 
I did see an article in the Daily Mail today. Eddie Dalton got to number 2 in the official UK singles chart. Now it seems that Eddie Dalton is an AI construct and not a real person after all. Crusty Records have made up other AI- generated artists as well is Mr Dalton. To bring things back to cave related I wondered about editing. Perhaps unwittingly we are using AI in our photos after all. Certainly my monochrome to colour editor does and very realistically though it gets the bus colours wrong. Without in any way meaning this as a criticism I looked at the Hall of Thirteen image coming on the Descent cover. Now I dont know what happens in house nor how the image was edited as I presume it must be. Does The Hall of Thirteen really look like this ? Certainly not as you see it by caving light. Then again does it really matter anyway ? I have noticed that Wookey Hole show cave achieves everything by well placed coloured lighting. Without that it would be very drab indeed. Sorry to harp on but I find the whole AI thing fascinating. Maybe we all live in the Matrix and nothing is real anyway.
 
The Old Ruminator said:
I did see an article in the Daily Mail today. Eddie Dalton got to number 2 in the official UK singles chart. Now it seems that Eddie Dalton is an AI construct and not a real person after all. Crusty Records have made up other AI- generated artists as well is Mr Dalton. To bring things back to cave related I wondered about editing. Perhaps unwittingly we are using AI in our photos after all. Certainly my monochrome to colour editor does and very realistically though it gets the bus colours wrong. Without in any way meaning this as a criticism I looked at the Hall of Thirteen image coming on the Descent cover. Now I dont know what happens in house nor how the image was edited as I presume it must be. Does The Hall of Thirteen really look like this ? Certainly not as you see it by caving light. Then again does it really matter anyway ? I have noticed that Wookey Hole show cave achieves everything by well placed coloured lighting. Without that it would be very drab indeed. Sorry to harp on but I find the whole AI thing fascinating. Maybe we all live in the Matrix and nothing is real anyway.
Click to expand...
I'm certain people are using it frequently without knowing, the latest couple of generations of iPhone often removes camera flash red eye automatically (I'm too cheap to own one, but the Lidar capability is intriguing).

Automated red eye removal is minor and a helpful feature - but begs the question of where do you draw the line? Where is the boundary of "real" and authentic and what's not authentic.

All those billboard and magazine adverts featuring people who have no capillaries in their corneas, is that authentic? (Probably automated removal). It's a sliding scale and I'd offer red eye removal at one end (helpful?) and bizarre cave diver floating stall at the other extreme (AI slop).

Edit: I meant capillary in sclera (white) not cornea, brain fart moment sorry
 
darren said:
Interesting use of the word "their". Obviously not including you, just other more stupid people?
I think of myself as pretty average, certainly not more informed or better than others.
Click to expand...

No, I don't see that it is "obvious" that it isn't including me. It's referring to people in the two groups I described. The post isn't about me, so it's irrelevant whether I fall into either group, and I really object to your unpleasant aspersion that I think myself to be better informed or less stupid than others. And I am disappointed that you take a serious point about the threat to democracy of AI and turn it into a personal attack on me.
 
The Old Ruminator said:
I did see an article in the Daily Mail today. Eddie Dalton got to number 2 in the official UK singles chart. Now it seems that Eddie Dalton is an AI construct and not a real person after all. Crusty Records have made up other AI- generated artists as well is Mr Dalton. To bring things back to cave related I wondered about editing. Perhaps unwittingly we are using AI in our photos after all. Certainly my monochrome to colour editor does and very realistically though it gets the bus colours wrong. Without in any way meaning this as a criticism I looked at the Hall of Thirteen image coming on the Descent cover. Now I dont know what happens in house nor how the image was edited as I presume it must be. Does The Hall of Thirteen really look like this ? Certainly not as you see it by caving light. Then again does it really matter anyway ? I have noticed that Wookey Hole show cave achieves everything by well placed coloured lighting. Without that it would be very drab indeed. Sorry to harp on but I find the whole AI thing fascinating. Maybe we all live in the Matrix and nothing is real anyway.
Click to expand...
Hall of Thirteen looked like that 40 years ago when I took this rather less well lit shot.
 

Attachments

  • DS150502135119 Descent.jpg
    DS150502135119 Descent.jpg
    183.9 KB · Views: 56
I thought that the cover picture of Descent was weird. I've been there a few times and never seen the gours with an ultramarine/aquamarine or what ever colour it is like that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top