jwtbids
New member
Hi all,
Myself and some others had a big day out in Quaking on Saturday, getting as far as the Crux, but we couldn't get the whole party through (which I'm sure is quite common!). It left us with some questions for those who are more familiar with the obstacle.
Passing Coitus Corner and chucking our kit into the bypass, I was the first to tackle the Crux. I wriggled as far as the left hand bend and thought that to stay 1-1.5m above the stream (as NFTFH dictates) looked so horrendous I wasn't sure it was really what I was supposed to do. Instead, I gained height above the streamway (eventually getting my feet on what were previously out-of-reach ledges), aiming for the roof tube which appeared much wider. Following the widest section (trending a few centimetres back towards CC) I ended up in the roof tube about 5m above the stream, where without too much difficulty could climb over the rift and drop back down on the other side of the Crux. From here I could easily go and retrieve my helmet which I had foolishly thrown far into the bypass, so I am certain that I had either gone through the Crux, or found a (second) bypass.
Having spoken to people after the trip, and reading a few reports, it seems that the Crux definitely is the horrible-looking section 1-1.5m above the stream - how does it compare to this contrived alternative, if anyone is aware of it? I encouraged a larger member of the party to try follow me into the roof tube but he could not see where I had gone and as such couldn't get through - is there any beta that helps with the intended route?
For reference I am relatively small at 5"7, and was able to barely fit through the stream-level bypass (with bare skin against the rock and a lot of exhaling) on the return.
Myself and some others had a big day out in Quaking on Saturday, getting as far as the Crux, but we couldn't get the whole party through (which I'm sure is quite common!). It left us with some questions for those who are more familiar with the obstacle.
Passing Coitus Corner and chucking our kit into the bypass, I was the first to tackle the Crux. I wriggled as far as the left hand bend and thought that to stay 1-1.5m above the stream (as NFTFH dictates) looked so horrendous I wasn't sure it was really what I was supposed to do. Instead, I gained height above the streamway (eventually getting my feet on what were previously out-of-reach ledges), aiming for the roof tube which appeared much wider. Following the widest section (trending a few centimetres back towards CC) I ended up in the roof tube about 5m above the stream, where without too much difficulty could climb over the rift and drop back down on the other side of the Crux. From here I could easily go and retrieve my helmet which I had foolishly thrown far into the bypass, so I am certain that I had either gone through the Crux, or found a (second) bypass.
Having spoken to people after the trip, and reading a few reports, it seems that the Crux definitely is the horrible-looking section 1-1.5m above the stream - how does it compare to this contrived alternative, if anyone is aware of it? I encouraged a larger member of the party to try follow me into the roof tube but he could not see where I had gone and as such couldn't get through - is there any beta that helps with the intended route?
For reference I am relatively small at 5"7, and was able to barely fit through the stream-level bypass (with bare skin against the rock and a lot of exhaling) on the return.
