Its not hard to find all the information
Graham claims interest in...by simply reading the CroW act...if thats too difficult i've summarised it here...
Nature conservation and heritage preservation.
The relevant authority may by direction exclude or restrict access?to any land during any period if they are satisfied that the exclusion or restriction of?is necessary?for the purposes specified
(Including)
? the purpose of conserving flora, fauna or geological or physiographical features of the land in question;
? the purpose of preserving ? any other structure, work, site, garden or area which is of historic, architectural, traditional, artistic or archaeological interest.
The relevant authority is the countryside body, or, where the land falls within a National Park, the National Park authority. However provision enables the Forestry Commissioners to act as the relevant authority for any land which appears to the Commissioners to consist wholly or predominantly of woodland.
Provision exists...for the authorities to restrict access to preserve features where necessary...managed by either EN, the CCW, the relevant National Park Authority or the Forestry Commission...
Does
Graham require any MORE information
or is that not sufficient...