Caving videos generally do not attract many viewers as caving is very much a minority sport. Consequently to attract and retain viewers a caving video has to be much better than videos of most other sports.
The videos entered in the competition were generally well-lit, competently filmed and show elements of post production editing. However to win a competition a video needs to be much more than this - it needs to appeal to a wide audience, engage and retain viewers, and wring some emotion from them - amusement, excitement, fear, anxiety, sadness, etc.
I scored all of the videos out of 5 for the following qualities: Overall impression, technical, post-production, audience retention and filming objectives. I hope my scoring is objective and fair. Picking a winner and runner up was not an easy task with several videos vying for the top spots.
Here are the results of my careful deliberations:
Runner Up: Imperial College - There and Back Again. This video has a narration and records an expedition and although the video and audio qualities are not great it did score highly for audience retention and filming objectives met and this was just enough to make second place.
http://youtu.be/uzpfFm1OnRA
Winner: Southampton University - Caves and Recreational Drinking. This video also has a story even if it is gross! Thought has been put into storyboarding, it does have audience retention and the editing is reasonably tight. The underground filming isn?t great as it uses mainly a helmet mounted camera, but having said this it scored fairly evenly across all 5 categories and this was just enough to grab the top spot.
http://youtu.be/_XS0mGhaw04
Well done to all videographers and congratulations to Imperial and Southampton.