cap n chris
Well-known member
To summarise: Traff needs to join BCA if there's to be any representation!
traff said:The BCA by only balloting their members only represents their members.
I'll re-iterate, the BCA purports to represent all cavers.
Whilst the data set I've presented cannot be considered truly representative, it should not be dismissed out of hand. Whether you like it or not there is a huge number of unrepresented cavers out there.
I'm suggesting the ballot is in fact pointless as it almost certainly won't be a true representation of UK cavers. I strongly suspect the opinion within the unaffiliated will be a resounding yes, way out gunning the no camp.
richardg said:In Britain we are all expected if we drive a car on the roads to have car insurance..
To responsibly cover the possibility of accident where either we or someone else is hurt....
Those who chose to drive about without insurance are a liability to themselves and others.
Being an active caver and being a member of BCA and therefore buying insurance is just the same as the above.
Therefore BCA represents responsible cavers
Taff .... Do you drive? and do you chose not to buy car insurance?....
Taff..... Do you cave and do you chose not to buy cave specific liability insurance...
damian said:Traff, an interesting point well made. Depending on the outcome of the CRoW Ballot BCA may need to amend a section of its consitution next year. If so, we will also be looking at other parts to amend at the same time. I will add this to the list. Thanks.
Damian Weare
BCA Secretary
graham said:traff said:I strongly suspect the opinion within the unaffiliated will be a resounding yes, way out gunning the no camp.
Suspect ain't good enough. Collect some data, if you can.
traff said:Graham, many of your arguments appear to based on opinion and without hard evidence. However I will bite. Of the sample set I quoted I am still in contact with some. I made contact with five of them, surprise surprise, they all were in favour of CRoW applying to caving. Anecdotal it may be but I maintain there are a huge number of unaffiliated cavers out there in favour of CRoW.
The BCA perhaps need to acknowledge the existence of others and pursue the CRoW act if for no other purpose than seeking clarity for the masses.
Also I note that non-cavers can join the BCA, do they get a say in the matter? Just playing devils advocate.
Perhaps you could let me know what you feel needs changing and I will look at it.traff said:Thank you for making the amendment. However there is more wording that needs to be addressed. Perhaps you should leave it on the agenda.
damian said:I've just amended BCA's website to say "It represents individuals and groups with ...". Sorry for any confusion, traff.
Damian Weare
BCA Secretary
Cookie said:damian said:I've just amended BCA's website to say "It represents individuals and groups with ...". Sorry for any confusion, traff.
Damian Weare
BCA Secretary
Do you think BCA will receive any praise for responding to its (non) members and acting within 12 hours?
Reckon so.Bottlebank said:Is this the page referred to? http://british-caving.org.uk/wiki3/doku.php?id=about:start
mmilner said:Support your national organisation. You can get insurance at a reasonable price...