Tangent_tracker said:I often do stuff like crabs etc. and they are superb for torches and the bezel of an oldham lamp etc. As for ropes I would rather not, as suggested above there is no way to tell which way the bits of grit could go - the cavitation by ultrasonic action could surely push inner cores apart and allow the further ingress of bits of calcite etc...?
crickleymal said:Tangent_tracker said:I often do stuff like crabs etc. and they are superb for torches and the bezel of an oldham lamp etc. As for ropes I would rather not, as suggested above there is no way to tell which way the bits of grit could go - the cavitation by ultrasonic action could surely push inner cores apart and allow the further ingress of bits of calcite etc...?
Why would ultrasound push dirt into the rope any more than using a scrubbing brush? I would have though a brush would be quite likely to do exactly that.
Burt said:you'll never get an oversuit in one.
I remain skeptical about this 'evidence' mainly because it was done on American rope rather than European rope. The few American ropes I have handled suggest to me that the sheath is far more tightly woven, so is less likely to let 'bits' into the core. (They are made to a different standard.) It would be nice to do a simple experiment to look for dirt (silica & limestone) in the core as opposed to what I suspect is staining from organics in the cave water. Does any one have access to a scanning electron microscope (or similar beast which can determine atomic species present)?paul said:Regarding using pressure washers to wash ropes, someone has done basic testing. See http://www.onrope1.com/Myth8.htm