Problems at BMC

Badlad

Badlad

Administrator
Staff member
It is a fascinating set of problems facing the BMC. These are problems caving will likely never face and the two organisations remain poles and oceans apart. If only caving could have a just fraction of what the BMC has in it C&A locker....

The majority of BMC membership comes from the trad climbing and hillwalking side which has traditionally focused on maintaining access and has been very successful in that, hence 85,000 supporters perhaps.

A big part of the problem of membership recruitment lies in the fact that many are introduced to climbing on artificial walls and a lot don't progress from there. There is little need to join BMC if that is what you do. In the last decade this has developed into sport climbing and an Olympic event. Sport England offers a ton of money if a Brit has a chance of winning. I think the BMC are obliged to contribute a percentage of the funding but it is not something to turn away easily. I suspect the reality has crept up on the BMC slowly and the backlash was seen a few years ago with the vote of no confidence. The man at the top was from an elite sports background and not a climber and this might have been good for the sport side but there was clearly a lack of understanding of where the sport came from and who BMC is. The projected growth was plain unrealistic.

I understand a recent council meeting said that the redundancies in C&A where not as severe as first reported. However, one feeling amongst my BMC member mates is that the organisation should split, with the competitive sport side moving away from the traditional organisation. We'll see.
 
C

ChrisB

Active member
British Canoeing has for many years had the same conflict between grant funded competition and recreational paddling. It leads to the recreational members feeling poorly supported, and the trend toward 'professional' executives and coaches tends to demotivate volunteers, eg, "why should I do this free of charge when they're earning a good salary?"

The difficulty is that if you split the organisation, the recreational side is no longer the government recognised official body, which makes it less credible in access negotiations, etc.
 
wellyjen

wellyjen

Well-known member
ChrisB said:
British Canoeing has for many years had the same conflict between grant funded competition and recreational paddling. It leads to the recreational members feeling poorly supported, and the trend toward 'professional' executives and coaches tends to demotivate volunteers, eg, "why should I do this free of charge when they're earning a good salary?"

The difficulty is that if you split the organisation, the recreational side is no longer the government recognised official body, which makes it less credible in access negotiations, etc.
Click to expand...
British Cycling claims to represent both sporting and recreational/transport cycling, but in practice is entirely sport focussed. Cycling UK, formerly Cycle Touring Club, is leisure and transport focussed and has the long standing contacts in officialdom to help get things done that a newly split off recreation wing of BMC, or Canoeing would lack.
 
F

Fjell

Well-known member
The BMC has got itself into a situation where public funding is entirely geared to a few hundred indoor athletes rather than the millions who wander around hills with various degrees of difficulty.

A further icky issue is that touring the country doing competition climbing is just another middle class activity that realistically costs £10k+ a year for teenagers to pursue, funded entirely or mostly by parents cash and time. However glam it seems, it really should not be the main focus for a national organisation that is supposed to be about the great outdoors for the many, which is still mostly an access issue.

The UK has a tendency to rack up medals in sports that cost a lot of money to get to a high level in. Sailing, rowing, shooting, track cycling, pony girls etc etc. It’s just medal farming.
 
M

mikem

Well-known member
If that were the case they'd be coming from within the sport...

Several NGBs are even recruiting & retraining athletes from other events
 
C

ChrisB

Active member
The BMC has got itself into a situation where public funding is entirely geared to a few hundred indoor athletes rather than the millions who wander around hills with various degrees of difficulty.
Click to expand...
But before competition climbing was enough of a thing to attract public funding, the BMC didn't get any all. Provided the recreational side isn't subsidising the competition, it shouldn't be a problem for the organisation. Whether funding of competitive sport is a good use of our taxes, and why Government doesn't also fund recreational sport is a different question.
 
F

Fjell

Well-known member
ChrisB said:
But before competition climbing was enough of a thing to attract public funding, the BMC didn't get any all. Provided the recreational side isn't subsidising the competition, it shouldn't be a problem for the organisation. Whether funding of competitive sport is a good use of our taxes, and why Government doesn't also fund recreational sport is a different question.
Click to expand...
I think the problem was they messed it up and it did affect the rest. Ignoring that, the point is they have hired as CEO someone whose primary skill is subsidy farming for competitive sport, not (for instance) legislation on access.
 
M

mikem

Well-known member
It's the general state of government subsidies for most projects - available for set up but not maintenance

​

They have a separate Head of Access, Conservation & Environmental Sustainability
www.thebmc.co.uk

BMC staff list

www.thebmc.co.uk www.thebmc.co.uk
 
cavemanmike

cavemanmike

Well-known member
I’m referring to the nepotism within the world of CEO’s. They claim to change the world while taking a big salary just to move on to the next big ceo job in the meantime they are building up their sv
 
AR

AR

Well-known member
cavemanmike said:
I’m referring to the nepotism within the world of CEO’s. They claim to change the world while taking a big salary just to move on to the next big ceo job in the meantime they are building up their sv
Click to expand...
"Seagull management" - fly in from afar, sit on top of things and make a lot of noise, then fly away leaving a load of shit behind for someone else to clean up...
 
mrodoc

mrodoc

Well-known member
I find caving very hard to classify as it combines so many sciences added to physical skills. It is probably unique, the nearest comparison being scuba diving although in my experience most divers do very little exploration or even seem that interested in marine life. Interestingly the advent of the digital camera has probably improved that aspect as it has brought underwater photography to the masses by making it relatively cheap. It has also highlighted changes in the marine environment such as the return of the crawfish to the south west.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top