It's fairly clear that the BCA is in desperate need of reform. IMO it needs to move towards a universal membership and a complete change in its constitutional structure. It needs a dynamic, expanded exec and a council which meets less frequently. Eight hour council meetings must end. There is too much of the tail wagging the dog with the traditional structure.
But this is a small organisation run by volunteers with limited time and ability to progress matters. Universal membership was mentioned at the first meeting I attended some three years ago as the desired route forward. There has been no mention of it since. With everything else taking up so much time I can't see any modernisation happening anytime soon. Anyone taking it on will know the mother of all battles that would lie ahead.
Without reform there is no point pretending there is any real democracy in BCA. The AGM is the power house but this is only attended by 30-40 people each year out of nearly 6000 members. Most of those are members of council who also attend the council meeting which follows. A few 'locals' will attend as it moves around the regions and this is likely to have a heavy influence on direction and policy each year. So, for example last year it was at the Hunters on Mendip, the stronghold of the anti CRoW movement. The chair was effectively battered into a corner and forced to accept motions that did not reflect the will of the wider membership. The only way out was to put things on hold and defer to the next AGM which is pretty much what happened.
A priority should be to get more people to vote at an AGM. Having them turn up in person is not realistic. Proxy voting is an answer and there is a motion on the table to allow it. However, the motion is poorly structured and doesn't have the support of the exec or many in council and will almost certainly fail. What is really needed is proxy voting BMC style but that is probably beyond the capabilities of BCA for many a year to come. All pretty depressing, eh?