• Descent 298 publication date

    Our June/July issue will be published on Saturday 8 June

    Now with four extra pages as standard. If you want to receive it as part of your subscription, make sure you sign up or renew by Monday 27 May.

    Click here for more

Cavers - why do we bicker about access so much?

NewStuff

New member
Droid.
Firstly - Stop using my name. It's a work thing, and out of my control, as you well know. It's a stupid, childish antic that will end badly for people should I get hauled up in front of my employer. You want to argue, discuss or debate caving issues, that's fine, but should you carry on involving my personal, non-caving, life I will cease to play nice.

Secondly - I have *never* said anything which I would not say to someones face. If I've called you (or anyone else) something on here, you can safely assume I would happily do it in real life. Given that I don't want to go underground with a lot of you, and I daresay the reverse is true as well, then it's unlikely we'll ever meet, but should you wish to change that, shout out and I'll ride down and we can discuss the issue. ;).

On Topic - I've said quite happily that I'm plenty happy with Derby keys if a landowner *insists* on gating, or it has unique conservation or safety issues. I've also said there's empire building idiots out there that would not like to see their illusion of power be reduced by a common sense move that would enable easier access without funny handshakes or being the correct someones mate. It's not as if we are demanding that all caves are open to everybody Some caves *do* need a gate, and a derby key is a good solution to deterring casual access by people who don't know about the dangers or how to avoid damaging features, but is a known and accepted method for explorers to have easy access when something *does* need a gate.
 

droid

Active member
NewStuff said:
Droid.
Firstly - Stop using my name. It's a work thing, and out of my control, as you well know. It's a stupid, childish antic that will end badly for people should I get hauled up in front of my employer. You want to argue, discuss or debate caving issues, that's fine, but should you carry on involving my personal, non-caving, life I will cease to play nice.

Secondly - I have *never* said anything which I would not say to someones face. If I've called you (or anyone else) something on here, you can safely assume I would happily do it in real life. Given that I don't want to go underground with a lot of you, and I daresay the reverse is true as well, then it's unlikely we'll ever meet, but should you wish to change that, shout out and I'll ride down and we can discuss the issue. ;).

Firstly: I didn't use your full name, I used an abbreviation of your first name, pretty much unidentifiable as you unless people already *knew*.

Secondly: I don't get out your end very often (though ironically came within 20 miles last weekend) but if you fancy a meet at the Ponderosa some time I'm not otherwise engaged, you are on.....
 

Pegasus

Administrator
Staff member
[admin]Droid/Newstuff - for goodness sake. You sound like you are arranging fisticuffs at dawn - which is (as of right now) banned on UKC. Please, back on topic - 'why' do cavers bicker not actual bickering, thank you[/admin]
 

droid

Active member
*back on topic*

We 'bicker' because many cavers/mine explorers have a bit of 'character', and tend to argue their cases vociferously, either on line or face-to-face.

Access is one of those topics that tends to lead to 'extreme' views.

Hence the bickering.

And it won't be 'fisticuffs at dawn'. Ponderosa doesn't open that early.....lol
 

NewStuff

New member
droid said:
*back on topic*

We 'bicker' because many cavers/mine explorers have a bit of 'character', and tend to argue their cases vociferously, either on line or face-to-face.

Access is one of those topics that tends to lead to 'extreme' views.

Hence the bickering.

And it won't be 'fisticuffs at dawn'. Ponderosa doesn't open that early.....lol

I don't like getting up that early  for work, so no chance of it if I'm *not* being paid for it.

In a strange turn of events, I actually agree with Droid, we tend to be an unusual bunch in the first place, I mean you can't care what people think nearly as much as the average member of the public, given the state we often end up in when walking to/from transport. Add to that an issue that creates divisions, such as access, and there is going to be some heated, strong debate. I don't think that anyone is going to arrange "fisticuffs at dawn", and if that was the aim, they would be kinda daft to advertise that on a public forum.
 

alastairgott

Well-known member
Curveball but actually I think there could be a very good reason. The perceived decline of the club Caving scene (I'm not totally sure about this).

There are two sides to this, the large clubs and the small clubs.

Large clubs tend to be those that have an easy tap into Caving in the local area (bpc with GG at the winch meet, SWCC with OFD and mendip clubs with any Cave in the area).
Some outside of these clubs may consider membership makes it difficult for them to obtain a permit for a cave or the need to invite the whole club when they want to ask for a permit.

This leads some to set up micro clubs with one to ten members, which for one ensures they get permits (if they're commercial or recreational cavers) but it also isolates them from the Caving scene a little.

Small to medium sized clubs 40-80 members will typically have access to a cave or mine and be able to encourage members to visit the caves within their region, there is absolutely nothing wrong with this situation.
One of my friends recently pointed out to me that this bracket of clubs have particular interests, whether it be a 'pet dig' that they visit week in week out or it could be a repertoire of 6-7 caves that they visit on an ongoing cycle ( for various reasons, either training newbies or pushing those already in the club).

I suppose I've been like David Cameron and waffled enough ;)

Essentially I think it's this friction within the club structure and the rigidity of others to join clubs and actually gain access to caves.

What can I say? They want to bicker? But that would be unfair!
 

droid

Active member
NewStuff said:
In a strange turn of events, I actually agree with Droid, we tend to be an unusual bunch in the first place, I mean you can't care what people think nearly as much as the average member of the public, given the state we often end up in when walking to/from transport. Add to that an issue that creates divisions, such as access, and there is going to be some heated, strong debate. I don't think that anyone is going to arrange "fisticuffs at dawn", and if that was the aim, they would be kinda daft to advertise that on a public forum.

Absolutely agree on all points....
 

todcaver

New member
Smiley Alan said:
todcaver said:
If you want to go down that road , do you want hard evidence ( say 2,3 years worth of emails and records of none returned phone call's with phone records stating dates and times with references to all relevant numbers identifing clubs e,c,t ?

how about this :

you are a total twat , the landowner knos it  and does'nt want  you in there cave . your posts kinda  prove it.

Likewise  :mad: :clap:
 
This is exactly the sort of tw@ttery which is why I don't get involved in anything to do with caving clubs, or the BCA, or any rescue nonsense. It's because of the utter whankers at each end of the spectrum. The people at the nanny end of the spectrum seem to be particularly tiresome. Look at the state of the willy waving above. "You're called Harold Smith and I'm going to tell your boss". "I'll tell on you to your caving club access officer". "You'd better not say this to my face, because I'm a massive rapey gorilla and I'll fump you"

Seriously. Why are you lot here? Why don't you join the Navy and then you can hold each other's cocks in the shower and boss people around/be bossed around?

I note many real enthusiasts down this way do not participate in any nonsense at all and despite working for various hole related organisations, whether eco-bollox, or mining related, the rule of thumb seems to be as follows.

1. Find a gate in the middle of nowhere. Chop the lock off, have a bar out, try to not make it obvious where possible.
2. Find a gate near public/animals. Chop the lock off, replace. If a bar, make sleeves for the bar to be removable.
3. Suspect a hole in someone's garden, if it can be done at night with camo. Do that.
4. " " " " if it cannot be done, ASK PERMISSION.

Asking permission, obtaining keys and showing insurance is great, where necessary, but various people seeking to install this everywhere is just cntery.

I'm here for the history, geology, excitement, wonder, discovery, sport, amazement and inspiration.

Some of you are here to dominate, control, wave your little willies, secure, manage, participate in an order, socialise, engage in fckery.

It appears that most people I meet in real life are really nice. Beyond a bit of trolling (which is just trolling) there is little harm meant. There are a hard core of utter bellends who seem to habit the interweb and who also hardly appear "on trips" with caving clubs, who seem to be there for solely as a replacement "structure" for something missing in their lives.

Live and let live maaaaaaaan.


............The best one I recall is this utter "specimen" from St Just. This place has a reputation for the family tree being so contorted, it's more like a cancerous fist! Anyway, this aside, a couple of us decided to venture into an adit which was formerly secured with nuts and bolt.  This set of tossers had taken it upon themselves to lock the place up with a padlock. The gate being in the most extreme place, inside a horrible wet crawly cave. I digress. We went in there, armed with a sketch plan of the place, saw the sites, left nothing but footprints and took nothing but understanding. On the way out, it was a horrible day, we met a chap coming along the path, in the drizzle. In hindsight, the guy did look a bit hostile. "Have you been underground?". I was with an IT technician and an engineer that day. I used to hang out with a Medical Doc who was a very good friend of mine. Anyway, one of these malformed and mentally damaged trolls from the local caving club took it upon themselves to phone Doc up and seriously threaten him with reporting him to the various authorities. "I WILL SEE YOU LOSE YOUR JOB". Sadly, he was very serious indeed and my good caving chum pretty much stopped caving as a result of that. After all, how do you pay your mortgage and protect your  new wife/child when you have no job?

I don't go around beating people up, but that's the closest I've come to it.

This is all totally avoidable, if people learn to ### well behave themselves and exhibit a bit of tolerance.

As a result, I am pretty much off the radar, apart from my good minded and decent friends at the CBC.


You're welcome to phone my boss up and tell tales. He'll reward me with a window of internet pr0n, a cup of coffee and then possibly a pack of wheat crunchies (bacon flavour)

 

Madness

New member
ianball11 said:
Hello Disgusted from Cornwall, I have a great fondness for the rescue teams and don't regard them as nonsense.

I think he was merely hinting at the 'politics' that can happen within any organisation. I don't think that he intended to suggest that rescue teams were nonsense.
 

royfellows

Well-known member
I would like to make the point that opinions expressed on the forum would carry a lot more respect even from those who disagree with them if they could be expressed without the use of bad language or profanities. Don't take this personally Stu, its widespread.

Anyway, a couple of questions for Stu.
Was the padlock mentioned fitted with legal authority, such as by the landowner or mineral owner if a different person?

Also, are minerals somewhere part of the equation regarding the sudden appearance of above mentioned padlock?

The the benefit of those cavers who have little knowledge of mining matters I had better explain that any nastiness you see relative to CROW for instance will pale into insignificance when compared to that of rival mineral collectors and dealers.
:LOL:


 

royfellows

Well-known member
Madness said:
ianball11 said:
Hello Disgusted from Cornwall, I have a great fondness for the rescue teams and don't regard them as nonsense.

I think he was merely hinting at the 'politics' that can happen within any organisation. I don't think that he intended to suggest that rescue teams were nonsense.

I go with this
 

Brains

Well-known member
ianball11 said:
Hello Disgusted from Cornwall, I have a great fondness for the rescue teams and don't regard them as nonsense.

I am not in on the details but I believe there has been some "turf war" issues with rescue in Cornwall which havent been seen elsewhere. I can therefore relate to the comments in relation to that area.

Cornwall COULD be an underground mecca for explorers, bringing a steady income to the area, and perhaps with scope for companies like Go Below in N Wales. The non savvy locals would rather bury thier heritage and fill the shafts with all the domestic junk that they cant be bothered to take to a proper disposal site. I dare say if opened up wisely it could see at least as much activity as the three peaks area. How much does that contribute to the out of season econmoy?
 

Madness

New member
Rescue Team turf war! :eek:

I suspect the poor soul awaiting rescue couldn't give a monkeys which team rescues them, as long as they know what they're doing.
 

Alex

Well-known member
I can say there has never been and never will be a rescue team turf war! Its not up to us anyway its up to the police who choose who they call out, thought we can then still say that's out of area. However, teams are ALWAYS willing to offer help to other teams should the need arise.

But other then that I agree in general we would do better to all get along, though I am not sure I would want someone in camo in my garden, unless they want to my gardening for me while they are there! (That's my access restriction should I find a cave in my front garden).
 

Ian Adams

Well-known member
Madness said:
I suspect the poor soul awaiting rescue couldn't give a monkeys which team rescues them, as long as they know what they're doing.


Quite true ... I am sure that a poor soul awaiting rescue will accept pretty much anything that prevents death.

I have not forgotten (have any of us?) the poor lady who fell down a shaft in Scotland and died waiting for rescue even though the fire brigade were present with all the gear to safely lift her out but DIDN'T because of health & safety "issues" as they had not been trained how to harness someone out of a shaft even though a fire officer had been harnessed down to her.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-15739209

Totally preventable death caused by (in my opinion) ridiculous rules and people who chose to put those rules ahead of "common sense".

Ian

 
Top