The Old Ruminator
Well-known member
So maybe its worth trying to untangle the history of cave development at Fairy Cave Quarry. For that, being an untrained geologist , I shall have to make assumptions. That plus the fact little in the way of research has been undertaken here.
The quarry is situated to one side of an ancient catchment feeding streams that sink underground and reappear at St Dunstan's Well. Shatter Cave is aligned ( though not necessarily within ) the Withybrook Fault which has thrown the bedding out of alignment forming a break in the impervious beds along the escarpment allowing underground water to escape. These , in effect, have formed a dam to contain underground water within the catchment. In time base level has dropped caused either by the down cutting of the Mells valley or in response to sea level changes. ( depending on which timescale you adopt ). Originally all water in both Withyhill and Shatter Cave was slow moving phreatic flow with little in the way of hydraulic gradient. Water comes off the Beacon Hill pericline ( rather like an upturned boat with steeply folded limestone now sharply worn down to expose the impervious sandstone core ). We see this on Western Mendip but here things differ. Streams run off the pericline to sink near the limestone shales boundary ( GB Cave et al ). Sink to rising gradient is much greater too ). At Fairy Cave Quarry streams continue to flow across the shales and Black Rock Limestone to sink near a denuded valley running from beyond Withybrook Slocker to the escarpment. This is due to the fact that periglacial head ( a gravelly solufluction product ) overlies parts of the BRL to stop streams sinking. Its probable you see some of this as sediment deposits in the caves. Possibly also that there is a 5m plus depth of head within the Withybrook Slocker doline.
The Withybrook valley contained a surface stream in glacial conditions as the ground was frozen. In warmer interglacials a large amount of water from melt sank into the limestone. The head deposit may date back to a major glacial period 400,000 years ago. Shatter might be close to 400,000 years old ( fitting somewhere between the genesis of GB Cave and Reservoir Hole.) Initially water sank lower down the valley as head was stripped back. This formed the Shatter Cave conduit. In time water sank at points higher up the valley forming the Withyhill route as the head retreated. At some time water was captured from the Shatter route to enter Withyhill Cave via the scalloped rifts in Glistening Pool Series. Clearly there have been phases with sediment accumulation and subsequent erosion still ongoing today. Stream sink back towards the pericline continues with Midway Slocker sinking within the head itself though this route will probably be immature. ( Similiarly this is occurring West of the FCQ catchment with Swallets feeding a younger resurgance at Ashwick.) There could well be an ongoing capture from one catchment to the next.
Accepting all of this very tentative appraisal we ask where will we find more cave ? Probably not at the end of either Withyhill or Shatter Cave the latter being almost underneath the denuded valley bottom near the farm. ( There has been a lot of recent infill along here by the farmer ). Certainly we will find more cave between Shatter Cave and Withyhill Cave for this appraisal suggests that the Jonathan's Chamber area is indeed part of the old Shatter Conduit. Jonathan's Chamber extension will link with Shatter Cave either along strike to the most Southerly part of Shatter or follow the fault to Four Ways. Both allow for a distance of new cave around 50m in length though with strike/dip alternative development up to 100m. There is also an outside possibility of a relict inlet running from the valley.
The quarry is situated to one side of an ancient catchment feeding streams that sink underground and reappear at St Dunstan's Well. Shatter Cave is aligned ( though not necessarily within ) the Withybrook Fault which has thrown the bedding out of alignment forming a break in the impervious beds along the escarpment allowing underground water to escape. These , in effect, have formed a dam to contain underground water within the catchment. In time base level has dropped caused either by the down cutting of the Mells valley or in response to sea level changes. ( depending on which timescale you adopt ). Originally all water in both Withyhill and Shatter Cave was slow moving phreatic flow with little in the way of hydraulic gradient. Water comes off the Beacon Hill pericline ( rather like an upturned boat with steeply folded limestone now sharply worn down to expose the impervious sandstone core ). We see this on Western Mendip but here things differ. Streams run off the pericline to sink near the limestone shales boundary ( GB Cave et al ). Sink to rising gradient is much greater too ). At Fairy Cave Quarry streams continue to flow across the shales and Black Rock Limestone to sink near a denuded valley running from beyond Withybrook Slocker to the escarpment. This is due to the fact that periglacial head ( a gravelly solufluction product ) overlies parts of the BRL to stop streams sinking. Its probable you see some of this as sediment deposits in the caves. Possibly also that there is a 5m plus depth of head within the Withybrook Slocker doline.
The Withybrook valley contained a surface stream in glacial conditions as the ground was frozen. In warmer interglacials a large amount of water from melt sank into the limestone. The head deposit may date back to a major glacial period 400,000 years ago. Shatter might be close to 400,000 years old ( fitting somewhere between the genesis of GB Cave and Reservoir Hole.) Initially water sank lower down the valley as head was stripped back. This formed the Shatter Cave conduit. In time water sank at points higher up the valley forming the Withyhill route as the head retreated. At some time water was captured from the Shatter route to enter Withyhill Cave via the scalloped rifts in Glistening Pool Series. Clearly there have been phases with sediment accumulation and subsequent erosion still ongoing today. Stream sink back towards the pericline continues with Midway Slocker sinking within the head itself though this route will probably be immature. ( Similiarly this is occurring West of the FCQ catchment with Swallets feeding a younger resurgance at Ashwick.) There could well be an ongoing capture from one catchment to the next.
Accepting all of this very tentative appraisal we ask where will we find more cave ? Probably not at the end of either Withyhill or Shatter Cave the latter being almost underneath the denuded valley bottom near the farm. ( There has been a lot of recent infill along here by the farmer ). Certainly we will find more cave between Shatter Cave and Withyhill Cave for this appraisal suggests that the Jonathan's Chamber area is indeed part of the old Shatter Conduit. Jonathan's Chamber extension will link with Shatter Cave either along strike to the most Southerly part of Shatter or follow the fault to Four Ways. Both allow for a distance of new cave around 50m in length though with strike/dip alternative development up to 100m. There is also an outside possibility of a relict inlet running from the valley.