• BCA Finances

    An informative discussion

    Recently there was long thread about the BCA. I can now post possible answers to some of the questions, such as "Why is the BCA still raising membership prices when there is a significant amount still left in its coffers?"

    Click here for more

Is carbide really dead? nostalgic yearnings from an LED user...

Peter Burgess

New member
That's the same as lime putty - which will convert to calcium carbonate relatively quickly by absorbing carbon dioxide. Lime mortar goes off by way of this reaction in a matter of a few weeks, if that.
 

martinm

New member
Cap'n Chris said:
topcat said:
What specifically are the concerns in caves [not counting dealing with waste carbide: I've got that sussed and never failed to remove all of mine, and often other people's from the cave]

Waste carbide being dumped is only a small part of the problem.

For the other conservation negatives of carbide check out pages 45 to 50, specifically 48 onwards:

http://www.scavalon.be/downloads/Cave%20Protection%20English.pdf

What a fantastic document Cap'n, thanx for that.  (y) (Now saved to HD.) SC Avalon, Belgium really have got it sussed...

The White River Series in Peak is gradually getting trashed/muddied (choose your word) by cavers doing the through trip without due care and attention, even crossing tapes for whatever reason.

There is a conservation plan for it, though I don't know of the current state of play with regards to the cleanup that was supposed to being done up there. Must find out...

Regards Mel. DCA Conservation Officer.
 

Fulk

Well-known member
Quote from Peter Burgess:

That's the same as lime putty - which will convert to calcium carbonate relatively quickly by absorbing carbon dioxide. Lime mortar goes off by way of this reaction in a matter of a few weeks, if that.

I suspect that the surface of a pile of spent carbide could well convert to calcium carbonate fairly quickly, but under the surface I would imagine that the reaction would not be so fast.

As for spent carbide being inert ? I knew somebody who was tipping out spent carbide into a cave, but unbeknown to him, he tipped some down inside his welly; several hours later when he was getting changed he discovered a nasty alkali burn on his leg (or foot, I forget which ? maybe both) . . . maybe poetic justice.

And yes, alkaline cells can leak; I recently changed some in an object (sensor) that just sits on a shelf and doesn't get battered about underground. When changing batteries I noticed the 'slippery, greasy' feel typical of alkali in the battery compartment.
 

nickwilliams

Well-known member
The fact that is stinks is a pretty good indicator that it contains more nasties than just calcium hydroxide, even if only in small concentrations.

More significantly, ISTR Pitlamp mentioning that spent carbide used to be identifiable in sumps in some caves. It can't do any good to the water borne fauna.
 

Peter Burgess

New member
I beleive it contains suplhur and phosphorus compounds. I believe the carbide smell some people love so much is the result of such impurities. Lovely.
 

martinm

New member
Peter Burgess said:
I beleive it contains suplhur and phosphorus compounds. I believe the carbide smell some people love so much is the result of such impurities. Lovely.

From Wikipedia:-

"The pure material is colorless, however pieces of technical-grade calcium carbide are grey or brown and consist of about 80?85% of CaC2 (the rest is CaO (calcium oxide), Ca3P2 (calcium phosphide), CaS (calcium sulfide), Ca3N2 (calcium nitride), SiC (silicon carbide), etc.). Because of presence of PH3 (phosphine), NH3 (ammonia), and H2S (hydrogen sulfide), the smell of technical-grade calcium carbide is part of the process or production and is produced intentionally to be unpleasant in larger concentrations, and noticeable in smaller ones, as a part of warning system for unwanted leaks, fires or explosion."

Yes, it does indeed appear to have some nasties in it, some of them pretty dangerous, eg:- phosphine and ammonia ... hmm. Don't use it!
 

grahams

Well-known member
Les W said:
Peter Burgess said:
Yes and long exposure clearly resutls in lon-term problems with spelling and typing.....

lon-term?  :tease:

And resutls.

It's a wonder anyone from my generation has survived. Cigarette smoke, strontium 90, lead/mercury fillings, lead pipes, asbestos, all sorts of nasties from the coal ash that my gran used to put on the rhubarb patch, oxalic acid, soot, collapsing burning slag heaps and now I find that the list also includes phosphine and ammonia. Thankfully, my carbide lamp has long been nothing more than an ornament.

 

Leclused

Active member
mmilner said:
Cap'n Chris said:
topcat said:
What specifically are the concerns in caves [not counting dealing with waste carbide: I've got that sussed and never failed to remove all of mine, and often other people's from the cave]

Waste carbide being dumped is only a small part of the problem.

For the other conservation negatives of carbide check out pages 45 to 50, specifically 48 onwards:

http://www.scavalon.be/downloads/Cave%20Protection%20English.pdf

What a fantastic document Cap'n, thanx for that.  (y) (Now saved to HD.) SC Avalon, Belgium really have got it sussed...

The White River Series in Peak is gradually getting trashed/muddied (choose your word) by cavers doing the through trip without due care and attention, even crossing tapes for whatever reason.

There is a conservation plan for it, though I don't know of the current state of play with regards to the cleanup that was supposed to being done up there. Must find out...

Regards Mel. DCA Conservation Officer.

Hi,

As a member of SC Avalon I'm pleased to see that Paul's document is still used as a reference :)

This said : Take a look at the following video :) This video is showing soot deposites in caves and how they can be removed in some situations.

https://sites.google.com/site/speleovig/Environnement/operation-mr-propre-a-ste-anne

This action took place in 2012 in a combined effort of cavers from different Belgian clubs

BR

Dagobert L'Ecluse (Sc Avalon - Belgium)
http://scavalon.blogspot.com
http://www.scavalon.be


 

martinm

New member
Leclused said:
Hi, As a member of SC Avalon I'm pleased to see that Paul's document is still used as a reference :)

This said : Take a look at the following video :) This video is showing soot deposites in caves and how they can be removed in some situations.

https://sites.google.com/site/speleovig/Environnement/operation-mr-propre-a-ste-anne

This action took place in 2012 in a combined effort of cavers from different Belgian clubs

BR

Dagobert L'Ecluse (Sc Avalon - Belgium)
http://scavalon.blogspot.com
http://www.scavalon.be

Nice one. Yeah, I've been using water spraying kit to clean stal too. (See my profile photo, from the BBC program Countryfile from a few years ago!) Can be very effective, if  the soot or mud hasn't been covered with newly deposited flowstone. (It can happen quite quickly, depending on deposition rates.)

Regards, Mel.
 

mrodoc

Well-known member
Back in my youth we used to write with carbide lamps on cave walls :-[. What I have observed is that the soot disappears even if new flowstone is not being deposited (so you won't find my signature anywhere underground). I presume this is bacterial action but is particularly noticeable in Pridhamsleigh Cavern where the carbide graffiti near the lake have virtually gone. Sadly mud balls hurled at the walls don't show the same propensity for decomposition. :mad:
 

graham

New member
Peter

I cannot speak for Prid - and I do know other places where marks on walls have vanished after the odd millennium or ten - but there are also many examples of it having been incorporated in flowstone, never to be removed.
 

dunc

New member
mrodoc said:
Back in my youth we used to write with carbide lamps on cave walls :-[. What I have observed is that the soot disappears even if new flowstone is not being deposited (so you won't find my signature anywhere underground).
I've seen older "graffiti" up north that has obviously been there a good number of years (I've seen carbide marked walls from 20-30-40 years previous). How long does it take to disappear?
 

Peter Burgess

New member
There are carbide scribblings on the walls of Surrey mines dating back to the 1960s as clear today as the day they were made. The only way carbon is going to disappear is if it is physically removed or covered in something else. It is not going to dissolve away or evaporate!
 

bograt

Active member
Oh, come on, how can you tell whether its carbide from 50 years ago or candle from 150 years ago? I've seen both underground, sometimes in the same place. The cave environment decides if it should stay, be very sure if you decide if it should stay or go, it might be the original explorers traces you are destroying.
 

graham

New member
bograt said:
Oh, come on, how can you tell whether its carbide from 50 years ago or candle from 150 years ago? I've seen both underground, sometimes in the same place. The cave environment decides if it should stay, be very sure if you decide if it should stay or go, it might be the original explorers traces you are destroying.

Well, in part one can use that which is written as a guide. "Pete Burgess wos 'ere march 25th 1962" is quite probably an inscription that was not made by a candle in the 1860s.

However, you make a valid point about traces of original explorers. This is a hard one, in some part, as in preserving such traces one is arguably accepting behaviour that would not be acceptable today.

The US, or so I believe, use a rolling fifty year limit to arbitrate between preservation and removal. That seems to me fairly reasonable.
 

bograt

Active member
graham said:
The US, or so I believe, use a rolling fifty year limit to arbitrate between preservation and removal. That seems to me fairly reasonable.

OK, so a "fifty year limit is reasonable", in another hundred years it is acceptable, but by then its lost? (Devils advocate)
 

graham

New member
bograt said:
graham said:
The US, or so I believe, use a rolling fifty year limit to arbitrate between preservation and removal. That seems to me fairly reasonable.

OK, so a fifty year limit is reasonable, in another hundred years it is acceptable, but by then its lost? (Devils advocate)

Peter is wrong. I have seen smoke marks (from torches) in French caves that have been radiocarbon dated to the Neolithic.
 
Top