Absolutely. Rank energy sources by deaths per kWh and nuclear comes last, even after roof-top solar due to installers occasionally falling off... [citation]Is nuclear part of the solution? Just wondering what people’s views are.
I haven't read much to suggest that pursuing a goal of net zero will plunge the world into poverty and starvation, but would be interested if you've got any recommendations?If (and it really is if), climate change is being caused by man-made CO2, the way we are going to solve the problem certainty won't be by plunging the entire world into poverty and starvation through Net Zero.
And how much environmental destruction would be needed to harvest all that energy Is the £10000 question & why so far the biggest wind farms are offshore.And how much environmental destruction would be needed to harvest all that energy?
Incidentally, wasn't Greta Thunberg recently arrested while protesting against wind turbines?
Ah yes, offshore, where there will be no environmental impact at all, which is why they are permitted to harass endangered species: https://media.fisheries.noaa.gov/2021-05/VWconstr_FinalIHA_OPR1.pdfAnd how much environmental destruction would be needed to harvest all that energy Is the £10000 question & why so far the biggest wind farms are offshore.
This wouldn't be a bad place to start: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Not-Zero-Irrational-Target-Impoverish/dp/1800752423I haven't read much to suggest that pursuing a goal of net zero will plunge the world into poverty and starvation, but would be interested if you've got any recommendations?