I assume there will soon be a vote on the future of group voting, it seems to me that there are calls from people who want to increase the bureaucracy of the group vote (and therefore ensure it's less inclusive) by restricting future AGM votes to only those clubs which are so bureaucratically efficient that they have printed out a letter in triplicate, signed in blood and had the letter officially blessed by the witch of Wookey hole.
If they are admitting now that they want rid of the group vote, then bring it, we'll have the vote now.
But by stating that you believe that the vote that was held at this years AGM was unconstitutional (even though it was one of the most attended meetings) is Farcical. Those that have said such a thing have shown their true colours in that they want to restrict the vote to a select few, and outright dismiss the views of the majority.
If I have put words in the mouth of anyone, then put me right, just saying what I see.