Interesting use of loaded language
By their own admission they have only sequenced 10% of positive tests
. 10% is a massive number of fully sequenced samples were 10% = 100,000 samples. The likelihood of that 10% being unrepresentative is extremely small. Its not an "admission", with all the implications of guilt that word carries, it is just presenting facts, which actually, for once, represent a significant effort and maybe 'world beating'.
Another thing to take away from the single vs multiple gene results is that the S gene test dropouts (the gene for the spike protein) is a very strong signal of the increase in the new and very likely more infectious variety, where mutations in that gene cause this effect. Ie the number of tests where the S gene is not detected are increasing over time, which in turn will increase the number of single gene only responses as the new variant becomes predominant, where a two gene result would have previously been obtained.
Also confirmed by the full sequencing (as noted above, 10% is a good enough sample to verify this).
The false positive myth has been repeatedly demolished, the only people persisting with this are contrarian journalists with poor numeracy. Again as noted above, a false positive rate should be constant, but yet we are expected to believe it is doubling practically weekly, without any mechanism.
All i can see is motivated reasoning, and an unwillingness understand. You are determined not to believe overwhelming evidence while claiming to be open minded. Even without the testing data, you would have to believe that major hospitals across the country are producing false statistics, and that hundreds of doctors are committing a criminal offence in completing death certificates. Why don't you want to accept the overwhelming evidence? You are implying a massive conspiracy within the medical profession world wide.