Peter Burgess said:
Well, I see feedback on this that doesn't appear on this forum, and isn't going to either. To use David Rose's phrase, "trust me".
So, "Do what we say, we won't be telling you why, but you had better do it because we say so. Trust us".
Trust *you*??? I'd rather drop a shaft on a dynamic half rope...
Yourself and Graham seem to think that if you vaguely wave your hands a little and murmur something about "not online" then that automagically makes everything ok, we should trust you. Granted, they may not be online, and you may not be able to link us to something, but names, sources, details... you lack all of the above, it's all very wishy-washy and I'm quite inclined to say, it does not exist in any way close to what you make out it does, and *that's* why it will never appear.
Trusting yourself would lead to gates on pretty much any hole in the ground, and a permission system that requires forms that need to be filled out in triplicate, a letter from your mum saying you can do it in your underwear as you've forgotten your oversuit, and be bestest mates with whoever is the guardian of that particular gate...