Madness said:
Why are people fixated on needing a high amount of lumens? Obviously the amount of lumens you need depends on the passage you're negotiating, but in reality you really don't need more than say 400 lumens the majority of the time.
Over Easter, I forgot my helmet on the way to Juniper Gulf and hired one from Inglesport. It came with a Petzl Pixa 2. I was amazed how comfortable it was to have so little weight on my head. It's only 80 lumens on the high setting, and most of the time I used the low setting of 20 lumens to save batteries. 20 lumens was dimmer than I'd prefer, but still perfectly usable.
For the last 10--15 years, "the best" caving lamps have been widely considered to be the brightest and most expensive. These lights have basically copied Scurions. They have a visibly (perhaps ostentatiously!) robust design, with metal bodies and battery boxes. They mostly use expensive custom batteries.
I think we're starting to see a change in that. For example, American cavers seem to be using Zebralights a lot, which are light, cheap, and use standard batteries. The Carbi light looks interesting. I like the idea of a flood beam that fills all your peripheral vision.
I suspect most cavers (including me) will still want a reasonably bright light, but we'll start to see more interest in other factors. How much does it weigh on the head? Does it have a warm/neutral light? How wide is the flood? How much would it cost to buy enough batteries for an entire expedition, and not even worry about recharging?
I don't understand why cavers think anything made of plastic is flimsy. The Pixa headlamps, for example, have been specifically designed for robustness in professional use. See Petzl's video, where they "crush" the light with an 80 kg weight (jump to 40 seconds in):
Pixa headlamp video