• CSCC Newsletter - May 2024

    Available now. Includes details of upcoming CSCC Annual General Meeting 10th May 2024

    Click here for more info

Obscure units

traff

Member
I recall reading or hearing a quote about always using obscure units (non SI) when publishing results, nobody will be bothered to check if they are correct. It may not have been phrased quite like that but that was the general gist of it.

Is it attributed to anyone? I?ve tried to google it but so far drawn a blank, so I thought I would ask you educated bunch.
 

Maj

Active member
Ooo! Ooo!

Another chance to use an obscure measure of length.

Depth of GG 16 ropes.

The small print:-
If it were in Somerset and you were planning on building a drystone wall  :)

Maj.
 

robjones

New member
The quote is "Measurements will always be expressed in the least possibly useful units. Velocity, for example, will be expressed in furlongs per fortnight."

This is sometimes listed as being one of "Klipstein's Laws" but Klipstein is simply the equivalent of Murphy (as in "Murphy's Law) for engineers, rather than a genuine person to attribute the quotation to.
 

Chocolate fireguard

Active member
robjones said:
The quote is "Measurements will always be expressed in the least possibly useful units. Velocity, for example, will be expressed in furlongs per fortnight.

Furlongs per fortnight measures speed, not velocity. No direction is specified.
 

robjones

New member
Chocolate fireguard said:
robjones said:
The quote is "Measurements will always be expressed in the least possibly useful units. Velocity, for example, will be expressed in furlongs per fortnight.

Furlongs per fortnight measures speed, not velocity. No direction is specified.

Recalling that the quote sought specifically mentioned furlongs per fortnight, I googled the term and found the quote more or less as I recalled it on this site: http://c2.com/cgi/wiki? from which I uncritically cut and pasted it to ukc. Googling the entire quote lead me to numerous engineering sites that listed versions of the quote among Klipstein's Laws, a name I'd not previously encountered. So I quoted the quote exactly as I found it, with incorrect terminology, on the grounds that one isn't supposed to muck about with quotes by correcting them.
 

AR

Well-known member
From the Peak mining perspective, I ought to champion the meer and its sub-divison the quarter cord as a measurement of distance, especially since it varies from liberty to liberty.... GG would be slightly under a quarter cord shy of three High Peak Queensfield meers.
 

Spike

New member
In an effort to make it up to Traff for straying more than a brontosaurus off topic, I spent a millifortnight perusing the interwebs. My mind was jogged by Rob's "furlongs per fortnight" and I came across this paper, which seems to have been published in Creative Computing magazine Jan/Feb 1978:

The Contributions of Edsel Murphy to the Understanding of How the Behavior of Inanimate Objects Affects Computing, Computing Devices and Computer Science.


Chapter III, Part B, Section 4, Corollary 9 reads:

Dimensions will be given in the least usable units. Tape velocity, for example, will be given in furlongs per fortnight.

Anyone using this comment as a hard and fast reference to this being the source of the quote however may be guilty of Citogenesis

Regardless, the paper's good for a chortle - in the same section, Corollary 1 states: Interchangeable parts, won't.

Hey ho, back to work...
 
Chocolate fireguard said:
robjones said:
The quote is "Measurements will always be expressed in the least possibly useful units. Velocity, for example, will be expressed in furlongs per fortnight.

Furlongs per fortnight measures speed, not velocity. No direction is specified.

So what about metres per second then ?
 

traff

Member
Thanks for the replies. I've found quotes going back to the 60's but nothing definitive.

Like the bit on citogenesis.
 
Top