Bit late on the uptake as usual, and have only glanced at the replies, but for what it's worth I get really irritated with that lovely band of people who insist upon using butterflies for single anchor rebelays. Sorry about that but it's a pet hate of mine!
Regardless of what any books may or may not say, I challenge anybody to undo a well-loaded butterfly that's been rigged in thin, muddy rope (and I'm talking about 5.5mm to 8mm) whilst down the bottom of a deep alpine pothole. If you put yourself in these places often enough, you'll find that one day you do need to untie that knot whilst you've got cold and battered hands in a cave that's near-freezing and you've got a casualty down below that you need to extricate as soon as possible. Don't know about laboratory tests but in the real world fig 8's are far better and less troublesome.
The other argument that I hear is that if the rebelay fails then a butterfly will suddenly be loaded in the manner that it was intended (i.e, laterally) whereas a fig 8 will be distorted. Probably true but also irrelevant in my opinion. I think that the only situation that this may be more important is if you've had to rig that rebelay very close below your previous anchor: something that is discouraged but not always avoidable.
Anyway, not had much sleep so hope I'm not inventing stuff or rambling too much...