oldboy said:Great article in Descent Magazine. Congratulations to all concerned. Look forward to reading the next episode
whitelackington said:Yes, why on Earth would anyone complain orther than The Shuttleworth Esate,
what could possibly be the publics motivation for stirring it?
Perhaps if people see or hear of trips taking place they just (wrongly) assume it's open for business?I've been down Shuttleworth Pot (with permission)
Surely if there were more permits available then there may be less pirating :doubt: ok, in theory it would, in practice, perhaps not!Which makes requests for increased access a difficult conversation to hold
dunc said:Can't see the rush, a few pretties and big piece of passage, couple of hours, big deal...
barrabus]I've been down Shuttleworth Pot (with permission)[/quote] [quote author=dunc said:Perhaps if people see or hear of trips taking place they just (wrongly) assume it's open for business?
Deek said:It needs a drain plug in the barrel at the entrance for a nice finishing touch.
Deek said:Seems to me that the article in Descent should have been held back until the permit system was in place. Why was it published so early. Of course people will pirate a trip when they are told how good the cave is and that the first permit will be issued sometime in the summer.
Glenn said:Deek said:Seems to me that the article in Descent should have been held back until the permit system was in place. Why was it published so early. Of course people will pirate a trip when they are told how good the cave is and that the first permit will be issued sometime in the summer.
Is that your excuse for pirating it then.... :-\
Deek said:I don't think a discussion about the pros and cons of pirating would be very productive. But if its a concern then its best not to advertise a great cave in Descent mag which has no access agreement in place. The internet also has a bit to answer for in making information so availiable and thus generating interest.