TheBitterEnd
Well-known member
And as I said in #54 and #195 exceptions are exceptions and should be treated as such. They should not be used to spread FUD and attempt to dictate national policy.
bog4053 said:(I can't do that clever quote thing like you lot)
Sec 26(1) gives the power to the relevant authority to exclude or restrict access to land for a purpose as laid out in Sec 26(3)(a). The relevant authority is defined in Sec 21(5) and (6) as National Park authority, Forestry Commissioners or the appropriate countryside body (being Natural England or Natural Resources Wales). No doubt Local Access Forums would be part of the process.graham said:Is there a specific mechanism under the act that allows for a specific site to be protected by being gated and having warden-led only trips? If so, can you give me the section of the act that lays this out?
paul said:bog4053 said:(I can't do that clever quote thing like you lot)
Just click on the "Quote" button above the message in question. Everything will then be between [ q u o t e ] and [ / q u o t e ] and will show as a quoted part of the reply.
Badlad said:The BCA working group remit does not cover Wales so it will be up to the Cambrian CC to respond to the green paper consultation .....
Badlad said:Since my last post seems to have killed off this lively debate.......
graham said:I think you need a deeper understanding of socialist thought. 8)
braveduck said:All quiet on the western front then,sure I can hear Silent Night.
Sleep well lads
I think you need a deeper understanding of socialist thought.
jasonbirder said:I think you need a deeper understanding of socialist thought.
I'm pretty sure he wouldn't have championed the rights of the "Landowner Class" to deny access to "The People"
graham said:jasonbirder said:I think you need a deeper understanding of socialist thought.
I'm pretty sure he wouldn't have championed the rights of the "Landowner Class" to deny access to "The People"
And neither am I. However, I am pretty sure that the Tooting Popular Front never rioted and rampaged through the gardens in Acacia Avenue, either.
bograt said:graham said:jasonbirder said:I think you need a deeper understanding of socialist thought.
I'm pretty sure he wouldn't have championed the rights of the "Landowner Class" to deny access to "The People"
And neither am I. However, I am pretty sure that the Tooting Popular Front never rioted and rampaged through the gardens in Acacia Avenue, either.
That's only 'cos there's no decent caves in Acacia Avenue,
graham said:bograt said:graham said:jasonbirder said:I think you need a deeper understanding of socialist thought.
I'm pretty sure he wouldn't have championed the rights of the "Landowner Class" to deny access to "The People"
And neither am I. However, I am pretty sure that the Tooting Popular Front never rioted and rampaged through the gardens in Acacia Avenue, either.
That's only 'cos there's no decent caves in Acacia Avenue,
Or indeed anywhere in Tooting. let's not push an analogy too far.