That was support attracted some while ago. The comment was about support being attracted now, with the word "especially", implying a significantly greater level of support than was previously expressed. It is just as likely that cavers are now having some misgivings over how they voted, in the light of how a few cavers are now behaving. One can't really tell as it would require another test of opinion, which is not going to happen.
Well, I see feedback on this that doesn't appear on this forum, and isn't going to either. To use David Rose's phrase, "trust me".
That was support attracted some while ago.
it would require another test of opinion
Newstuff, I don't know who you are or what I've done to upset you, but I was merely referring to the fact that Badlad (aka Tim Allen) has been leading the lobbying effort to get other outdoors bodies onside and ought to answer the question. And as he's just made clear, in due course he will make a full report to the BCA. I have always tried to be transparent and honest in debating this (and any other) issue. For example, when I spoke to the Draenen landowner and got answers that I didn't like and which didn't help the cause I posted them anyway because I believe people have a right to be informed. OK?
c) have a lot of boring circular conversations.
If the BCA were offered the chance to apply for a judicial review right now for a simpler case than Drws Cefn for £1 with no potential liability, would they not choose to do it?
Main Menu