ditzy 24//7
Active member
i have recently heard that there has been an increes in mozzies due to global warming because they are breeding later due to the season tempriture does any one no if this is true?
cap 'n chris said:I've recently read an in depth well-researched (over 10 years) study which argues coherently and convincingly that the world's population has already tipped the brink into major, rapid, catastrophic decline resulting in the loss of about 90% of the present world's population due to famine, disease, wars and collapse of manufacturing, distribution and economies. Given that dying is worse than sun burn, doesn't this take priority over global warming being of concern?
cap 'n chris said:I've recently read an in depth well-researched (over 10 years) study which argues coherently and convincingly that the world's population has already tipped the brink into major, rapid, catastrophic decline resulting in the loss of about 90% of the present world's population due to famine, disease, wars and collapse of manufacturing, distribution and economies. Given that dying is worse than sun burn, doesn't this take priority over global warming being of concern?
Ref: The Rapid Growth of Human Populations 1750 - 2000, by Dr William Stanton, Multi-Science Publishing, September 2003, ISBN 0 906 522 218
langcliffe said:Anne said:What has/is happening to those estuaries that is an example of isostacy? - Just interested to know!
As Scotland rises, the south coast sinks (as a piece of floating wood does when you remove a weight from one end), drowning the valleys and forming the estuaries.
ditzy 24//7 said:i have recently heard that there has been an increes in mozzies due to global warming because they are breeding later due to the season tempriture does any one no if this is true?
cap 'n chris said:I've recently read an in depth well-researched (over 10 years) study which argues coherently and convincingly that the world's population has already tipped the brink into major, rapid, catastrophic decline resulting in the loss of about 90% of the present world's population due to famine, disease, wars and collapse of manufacturing, distribution and economies. Given that dying is worse than sun burn, doesn't this take priority over global warming being of concern?
Ref: The Rapid Growth of Human Populations 1750 - 2000, by Dr William Stanton, Multi-Science Publishing, September 2003, ISBN 0 906 522 218
Peter Burgess said:The statement that Chris made was that the population 'has already tipped the brink ... resulting in etc etc'
I read this to mean that the result WILL BE rather than the result HAS BEEN.
dunc said:It's the melting of the Greenland Ice Sheet that will cause the main problems rather than the North Pole sea ice.
bat said:dunc said:It's the melting of the Greenland Ice Sheet that will cause the main problems rather than the North Pole sea ice.
Sorry for the late comment (could not log on) but I think it is the expansion of the water in the oceans as the general temperature rises that will be responsible for most of the rise in the sea level
bat said:Sorry for the late comment (could not log on) but I think it is the expansion of the water in the oceans as the general temperature rises that will be responsible for most of the rise in the sea level
cap 'n chris said:I've recently read an in depth well-researched (over 10 years) study which argues coherently and convincingly that the world's population has already tipped the brink into major, rapid, catastrophic decline resulting in the loss of about 90% of the present world's population due to famine, disease, wars and collapse of manufacturing, distribution and economies. Given that dying is worse than sun burn, doesn't this take priority over global warming being of concern?
Ref: The Rapid Growth of Human Populations 1750 - 2000, by Dr William Stanton, Multi-Science Publishing, September 2003, ISBN 0 906 522 218
On that basis, practically everything I have ever written is complete rubbish. Come to think of it, you might be right....andymorgan said:cap 'n chris said:I've recently read an in depth well-researched (over 10 years) study which argues coherently and convincingly that the world's population has already tipped the brink into major, rapid, catastrophic decline resulting in the loss of about 90% of the present world's population due to famine, disease, wars and collapse of manufacturing, distribution and economies. Given that dying is worse than sun burn, doesn't this take priority over global warming being of concern?
Ref: The Rapid Growth of Human Populations 1750 - 2000, by Dr William Stanton, Multi-Science Publishing, September 2003, ISBN 0 906 522 218
It isn't a peer reviewed article, so has less validity than such an article.