any chance of a cave science board on the forum?

[Glenn]

Hmmm. That would be me then...

Glenn, I'll send you an email.

I've emailed you

 

[barrabus]

I've emailed you

Email received.

Thanks.

 

[bubba]

Knock yourselves out...

 

[Roger W]

  :bow:  :bow:  :bow:

 

[SamT]

While we're on , how about a 'lights/lamps' child board under equipment.  I'm sure it'd be beneficial to have all lamp/led/lighting threads in one place.

 

[ian.p]

awesome cheers bubba 

 

[kay]

child board

Oh!!! So when you(bubba) set up the "Shit heap" child board, you were referring to the location of the board, not the mindset of the unwilling contributors!

(Sometimes I can be very slow to catch on)

 

[Roger W]

While we're on , how about a 'lights/lamps' child board under equipment.  I'm sure it'd be beneficial to have all lamp/led/lighting threads in one place.

That's a bright idea! 

 

[ogof addict]

our bca membership man says there is no access code on our white card. do we just have the wrong sort of membership?

it might get used more if more club cavers knew about it and knew how to log on

 

[Glenn]

our bca membership man says there is no access code on our white card. do we just have the wrong sort of membership?

it might get used more if more club cavers knew about it and knew how to log on

I can't answer this without knowing which club it is. In short, if your club has not elected to pay for the optional BCRA membership, then you will not have the access codes.

You can email me at the BCA membership address if you want me to check further.

 

[Glenn]

it might get used more if more club cavers knew about it and knew how to log on

Sorry, I meant to add that if a club has elected to also join BCRA, then it should be the club that advertises the access to on-line Cave and Karst Science to it's members.

 

[Pitlamp]

Thanks for your efforts Bubba - I've already found a reason to use the new science area.

 

[Peter Burgess]

The new section needs a tagline (as do several other boards). How about

"Long sentences and multisyllabic words"

 

[ogof addict]

"Long sentences and multisyllabic words"

thats far too succinct and not enough multisyllabic, tortuous, incomprehensible linguistics. nor is there sufficient wordage to uphold the correct, third person, rigid grammatical structure required for such close proximity to academia.

the author apologises to the previous author for failing to correctly reference his post according to the approved Harvard system

 

[Les W]

according to the approved Harvard system

When was the Harvard system approved on this board? Did I miss it? 

 

[TheBitterEnd]

The new section needs a tagline (as do several other boards). How about
...

Get ya geek on

 

[ogof addict]

Les of course you didnt miss it