Yes, that's one but not the only reason to produce coke. Judging by the smell of sulphur in Port Talot, I would guess that the coking coal they use isn't especially low in sulphur. Most of the sulphur is removed in the blast furnace anyway where it combines with limestone in the charge and the remainder is removed using a variety of other techniques.I'm a bit puzzled by the reference to it having too much sulphur, the whole point of the coking process is to remove sulphur, so that in the partial burn of a blast furnace, you only get carbon monoxide generated and no/negligible sulphur dioxide.
I wonder how many who in the 80's "dug deep for the miners" are now demonstrating against coal and fracking?![]()
Britain should embrace new coal mining
For those of us who remember the miners’ strike in the 1980s it takes some getting used to the journey made by coal miners over the past 40 years: from working class heroes to climate ‘criminals’. To hear today’s reaction to the news that Michael Gove has granted permission to build Britain’s...www.spectator.co.uk
There are some interesting points made in this article about the use of coal in steel production.
Well... I think people on here like old mines and mining history - and probably have a fair interest in modern mining as well.I thought people here liked mines?
Not something you hear very often.I'm finding it hard to say if I'm in favour or not. The more I read the more compexities I am aware of.
Ah, but before that it was sheep (or wool). Thing's change.There is only 1 bit of truth we all have to remember and ACCEPT.
Englands true source of wealth lies in coal
Absolutely: I agree with you that the old mantra of: reduce, reuse, and only last... recycle, got lost to many people years ago and unabated consumption has become unquestioned, so it becomes a matter of bean-counting local carbon quotas and if made in China it's not on our tally. If we outsource manufacture to China/India etc not only do we need to worry about shipping like you mention but we must question if some goods made in China would be manufactured as environmentally carefully as in UK/Europe. Primary steel production is the big one in this thread. If X tons of steel are made in India using their local coal and transported to UK, will that be more or less polluting (not just the CO2 equiv) than making the same amount of steel in UK using UK coal/coke? If anyone has any figures that would be interesting. </RANT>I suspect that the Green zealots have little understanding of where all their manufactured goods come from and how they are made. Where's the sense in exporting all our industry to China and India and using energy to ship their products here?
There's only one growth industry here, Logistics and warehousing to store and distribute imported goods. Everywhere you go in Britain these days you see massive warehouses
Post war there were hundreds of coal mines in the UK. It was economics and capitalism that closed them down, not Green zealots.I suspect that the Green zealots have little understanding of where all their manufactured goods come from and how they are made. Where's the sense in exporting all our industry to China and India and using energy to ship their products here?
No, but, I remember taking them back to get 3d (three old pence.)Anyone here remember returning a bottle to a shop and getting 10p?
England sits on Coal and is surrounded by Fish ,what could possibly go wrong ?There is only 1 bit of truth we all have to remember and ACCEPT.
Englands true source of wealth lies in coal