Guardian article

bograt

Active member
Cookie said:
Ah so it is all the diggers fault. Silly me  :unsure:

Badlad said:
Of course a large number of caves remain on non CRoW land so we will always need voluntary arrangements and insurance for those but the fewer they are the better in my opinion.

Surely this blows your carrot and stick insurance argument out of the water.

:LOL: :LOL: :LOL: - First response from Mendip  :LOL: :LOL: 'Scraping the bottom of the barrel' springs to mind.

Keep up the good work Badlad  (y) (y)
 

Clive G

Member
Badlad said:
. . .

At Draenen, the original entrance was dug without landowner consent, in fact the diggers were told they would not be granted permission, but they continued anyway.  The landowner changed and permission was granted for access, but when another team dug a second and third entrance without permission we have ended up with the sorry state of affairs we have today.  If the landowner changes again who knows what the access situation will be.  That is exactly why a legal right of access for recreational caving is so important for the future of our sport.

. . .

The first and original entrance to Ogof Draenen was dug with the permission and blessing of the nearest occupier of the land.

Following a number of visits to the area during the 1980s, I visited Pwll Du on 17th June 1988 in order to look for the site of the Garnddyrys-branch entrance to the Pwll Du Tram Tunnel. I'm pretty certain that it was on this day I went into the Lamb & Fox Inn at Pwll Du and met Brian Lewis for the first time.

I had a drink in the pub and I bought Brian a drink, describing to him what caving is about and my interest in the Pwll Du Tram Tunnel. Brian was in quite an isolated spot up there at the time with his pub and said to me that he would be very pleased if cavers could find a tunnel near the pub. He thought that it would be good for business and also for general interest in the area ? which otherwise seemed largely forgotten at the time. Whether 'tunnel' or cave, Brian was quite happy for cavers to go hunting for underground passages on the land he occupied.

Later, between Christmas 1989 and New Year 1990, I took Hugh Penney up to the entrance of 'Ogof Draener' (as it was then known) to show him the site with its powerful draught as a potential dig. Hugh took a picture of me and I took a picture of him. I had been based in Cardiff between 1987?9, living at Galston Street where Peter Bolt was also based and Lou Maurice later resided. I joined Morgannwg Caving Club at the time. I seem to recall Hugh Penney was also a Morgannwg member but have no idea as to whether he passed on the details of the Ogof Draenen dig to other Morgannwg members such as Peter Bolt, etc.? However, the connection is there.

After the cave went in October 1994 the absent freeholder of the land - there were no fences or notices relating to land ownership or access at Pwll Du between the road and the cave entrance at the time, simply open moorland - The Coal Authority - was approached with a view to formal access permission being granted in writing, except The Coal Authority preferred, at first, for the status quo to be maintained: provided they weren't formally informed about the cave then they would not object to cavers continuing to access the cave.

After a while The Coal Authority decided that they wanted to sell the land, so changed their mind and the verbal 'arrangement' with the cave explorers was converted into a formal written agreement.

The land including the cave entrance was then offered for sale, upon which news the explorers were interested in buying the land around the entrance, to ensure future access. Thus, those who were exploring Ogof Draenen commenced fund raising measures to enable the purchase of the land, until it was discovered that they would be bidding against Brian Lewis and his other (unknown) local associate(s) and so the idea to bid for the land was dropped in deference to the current occupier(s).

Once the transfer of ownership had taken place, the new landowner(s) were happy to adopt the existing access agreement, with some modifications.

One significant part of the agreement is that no further 'entrances' are dug into the same cave - which leaves us where we are today.

However, an 'emergency exit', if agreed upon reasonably by all parties concerned, does not seem to be ruled out by the landowner(s).

Clive Gardener

 

Clive G

Member
Clive G said:
. . .

Thus, those who were exploring Ogof Draenen commenced fund raising measures to enable the purchase of the land, until it was discovered that they would be bidding against Brian Lewis and his other (unknown) local associate(s) and so the idea to bid for the land was dropped in deference to the current occupier(s).

. . .
Clive Gardener

I have heard it said that although those who discovered and were exploring Ogof Draenen dropped the idea of bidding for the land, someone else still went ahead with trying to gain personal ownership of the land around the cave entrance by bidding against those who occupied the land and wished to make the purchase jointly between themselves.

Perhaps the person concerned would like to explain why they did this?
 

David Rose

Active member
I've got a strong feeling that a person who has commented multiple time son that article is a certain southwest caver who used to post a lot on here, and was sometimes very offensive. But I could of course be wrong. How I wish everyone would use their own, real names when commenting either here or on national newspaper sites. What is there to hide?
 

NewStuff

New member
David Rose said:
I've got a strong feeling that a person who has commented multiple time son that article is a certain southwest caver who used to post a lot on here, and was sometimes very offensive. But I could of course be wrong. How I wish everyone would use their own, real names when commenting either here or on national newspaper sites. What is there to hide?

Some people just can't. My work means I can't use my real name on Forum's, social media etc, which is why I get really pissed off with people deliberately using it on here*. I don't give 2 hoots if someone knows it, but my employer does, and sadly I'm not rich and therefore need a job.

While it would be nice, some people do have genuine reasons.

*Yes, Droid, I'm looking at you, it's not big or clever.
 

Brains

Well-known member
Just spent a very disapointing while reading the comments on the article.
Seems somebody is very unhappy with the referendum result and has moved on to a new soapbox.
All the usual red herrings and misinformation, but to a new audience
 

Brains

Well-known member
Yea that is required, a disproportionate amount of bleating about keeping the landed gentry in control, when a referendum has clearly shown a desire to open up access.

I am male, but neither your dear or young enough to be a boy. Just makes you look patronising, please dont do it
 

droid

Active member
NewStuff said:
*Yes, Droid, I'm looking at you, it's not big or clever.

Now you've publically explained your apparent contradictory attitude, I'll happily change my sig.

It's good to talk.....lol
 

Huge

Well-known member
Badlad said:
At Draenen, the original entrance was dug without landowner consent, in fact the diggers were told they would not be granted permission, but they continued anyway.

I know Clive has already commented on this but I feel that I also, being one of the Draenen diggers, have to point out that this statement is incorrect.

The then landowner, did not tell us or anyone else for that matter, that permission to dig would not be granted if asked for. So we did not 'continue anyway' with the dig, in the knowledge that the landowner would not grant permission.

As far as I am aware, no cavers ever asked permission to dig on the Pwll Du hillside. Before we started digging at Draenen, a few sites had already been opened up by cavers. Sites such as Tumble East Resurgence, Ogof Cadno Gwal (only a few metres from the Draenen entrance) and Draenen itself, which had been opened up from the surface and dug to a length of a few metres by members of two other clubs, neither of whom, as far as I know, asked permission to dig.

Following a digging session, we would call into the Lamb and Fox for a pint. Brian, the landlord, was obviously curious as to why a group of muddy people were turning up at his pub, late on a Thursday night. When we told him what we were doing, his response was 'Oh, you're alright going there'.

AFTER the breakthrough, when there were suddenly lots and lots of cavers crossing the land and going into Draenen, an individual at the Coal Authority (the landowners) was approached unofficially and sounded out about the situation. His response was, as Clive said, 'If you ask officially for permission to cross the land, you will be denied. If things are left as they are, we can deny any knowledge of you, if there was to be any problem'. He also added 'Don't go digging any more holes on our land'. And no, he wasn't prompted to say that by 'empire building cavers'. In fact, another hole was dug. This was spotted by one of the current landowners, who ran sheep on the Coal Authority's land at that time. He was not happy and said that if any more holes were dug, he would inform the Coal Authority and make sure they banned cavers from the land. He also was not prompted to say that by 'empire building cavers'. When the ownership changed hands and the new access agreement was drawn up, one of the conditions was that no more entrances would be dug into Draenen.
 

Peter Burgess

New member
That's the most credible account I have read for a very long time about this place. It's exactly what happens in the real world. Thanks for posting it.
 

droid

Active member
You mean the 'real world' that is a sort of pragmatic 'shade of grey' rather than 'black and white'?
 

Peter Burgess

New member
The details of the way things develop in the account resonate with me as exactly how real cavers work things out. No bluster, no spin, no half-truths - just what normal people do to get things done.
 

NewStuff

New member
Peter Burgess said:
The details of the way things develop in the account resonate with me as exactly how real cavers work things out. No bluster, no spin, no half-truths - just what normal people do to get things done.

So your implication is that people for open access are not "real" cavers, use half truths, bluster and spin whereas "real" cavers, those that favour gates, permits etc do not?
 

Badlad

Administrator
Staff member
Badlad said:
At Draenen, the original entrance was dug without landowner consent, in fact the diggers were told they would not be granted permission, but they continued anyway.



Huge said:
As far as I am aware, no cavers ever asked permission to dig on the Pwll Du hillside.

Following a digging session
, we would call into the Lamb and Fox for a pint. Brian, the landlord, was obviously curious as to why a group of muddy people were turning up at his pub, late on a Thursday night.
When we told him what we were doing, his response was 'Oh, you're alright going there'.

AFTER the breakthrough, when there were suddenly lots and lots of cavers crossing the land and going into Draenen, an individual at
the Coal Authority (the landowners)
was approached unofficially and sounded out about the situation. His response was, as Clive said,
'If you ask officially for permission to cross the land, you will be denied.

Sorry, I may be wrong, and it wasn't the point I was making anyway, but it doesn't sound like you had permission from the Landowner at all.  Even if Brian at the local pub was in a position to give you permission on behalf of the landowner you had clearly been digging there before he gave that permission.  You admit yourself that if you asked for permission it would be denied.

My information came from a respected and trusted source and I have passed that onto Clive.
 

droid

Active member
NewStuff said:
Peter Burgess said:
The details of the way things develop in the account resonate with me as exactly how real cavers work things out. No bluster, no spin, no half-truths - just what normal people do to get things done.

So your implication is that people for open access are not "real" cavers, use half truths, bluster and spin whereas "real" cavers, those that favour gates, permits etc do not?

It implies to me that 'real cavers' actually speak to people that can help them in a reasonable way, rather than standing on a soapbox and demanding their 'rights'

I'd bet even the saintly NewStuff has done things this way on occasion.....
 

Peter Burgess

New member
NewStuff said:
Peter Burgess said:
The details of the way things develop in the account resonate with me as exactly how real cavers work things out. No bluster, no spin, no half-truths - just what normal people do to get things done.

So your implication is that people for open access are not "real" cavers, use half truths, bluster and spin whereas "real" cavers, those that favour gates, permits etc do not?
No, that's YOUR implication.
 
Top