• Win a Rab Protium 27L Backpack with the 2nd of the Inglesport Fabulous 5 competitions!

    To enter, simply post your tale/photo about carrying loads underground or to/from caves (both home and abroad). It’s a wide brief, anything to do with getting kit from A to B qualifies! Sometimes a picture is worth a 1000 words, hence - photos most welcome!

    Click here to enter!

Innovative Short-Term Synchronous-Asynchronous Ambient Noise Tomography Unveiled for Urban Karst Exploration

alanw

Well-known member
Lots and lots of maths and science, then This sophisticated imaging process revealed two prominent low-velocity anomalies at depths between 40 and 60 meters, correlating closely with karst cave systems identified independently by drilling data. It does seem to rely on the presence of "seismic ambient noise", presumably vehicle traffic, etc. however.

 
Lots and lots of maths and science, then This sophisticated imaging process revealed two prominent low-velocity anomalies at depths between 40 and 60 meters, correlating closely with karst cave systems identified independently by drilling data. It does seem to rely on the presence of "seismic ambient noise", presumably vehicle traffic, etc. however.

Or get lots of your mates to jump up and down while you run the data gathering.
 
Ambient noise can be quite useful. To understand is structure is vulnerable to earthquakes, one useful bit of data is it's natural vibration frequency. This was successfully tested on Swiss dam by measuring it's response to gusts of wind on the concrete face.

The technique in the link, with generated noise rather than ambient, should be capable of finding caves - maybe somebody in BGS or the like could develop something dual purpose - for urban cavities and rural caves?
 
with generated noise rather than ambient
Obviously the oil and gas industry uses "generated noise" for seismic surveys but I wonder how much this technique is dependent on the noise coming from a large number of sources widely distributed around the study area?
 
We already use 2D passive seismic surveys at BGS to help identify subsurface features. These rely on natural background seismic noise rather than setting off explosions or using vibroseis trucks. It is good for the shallow subsurface, for example picking up buried glacial channels/valleys and faults. Not sure how useful it will be for picking up voids as the seismic noise needs a good reflector. 3D tomography is a more sophisticated, as you need lots of instruments, the researchers used 197 nodal seismic receivers, arranged with an average station spacing of just seven meters. interesting though...
 
Back
Top