Peter Burgess said:
keeps it away from those with an agenda
Certainly seems you're against transparent access agreements...
There is access to the system. Maybe not to the tunnel itself, though Id tend to disagree based on recent activities in there.
There's an agreement in place for this access. However limited it is. Having this agreement in the open encourages people to comply, rather than break in. Though those who put this system in place etc deserve nothing but thanks in my opinion.
My problem comes in the secrecy surrounding this agreement. "Oh there's an agreement but we won't tell you" just says to me "well, let's go in anyway, cos we won't get in properly"
If you need to be on a working party, say so, if you need to get in touch with someone, say so. Say what information they need and what hoops you need to jump through.
Adding a layer of secrecy just serves to alienate more people who will just do what they want anyway. Ruining the hard work to gain official access, however limited.
One of the most sensitive sites I know of, is Boreham Cave. How do you get access? Well you join the CDG, qualify and join one of the four organised trips per year. Not exactly open access, but very few problems, cos everyone knows exactly what they need to do to keep access to the place!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk