because my view is unpopular with the audience
i assume you mean Cavers...audience
NewStuff said:Peter Burgess said:Any more abuse here and I will cancel the event. For those too pissed or angry to notice, this was a poor attempt at humour. Sorry.
So, people call you on your shenanigans and you threaten to take your ball home? All that twaddle beforehand about being reasonable... seems to me to be a case of do as I say, not as I do.
No need to worry though, I will not be attending that particular NAMHO.
crickleymal said:NewStuff said:Peter Burgess said:Any more abuse here and I will cancel the event. For those too pissed or angry to notice, this was a poor attempt at humour. Sorry.
So, people call you on your shenanigans and you threaten to take your ball home? All that twaddle beforehand about being reasonable... seems to me to be a case of do as I say, not as I do.
No need to worry though, I will not be attending that particular NAMHO.
It was humour, something you don't seem to understand! Sheesh!
Yes it does. It taught me to take care who to have an intelligent discussion with, and who to keep at arms length. What it doesn't tell me, which I have learnt elsewhere, is never to be afraid to say what you mean and mean what you say.jasonbirder said:because my view is unpopular with the audience
Well as you're on UKCaving...when you sayi assume you mean Cavers...audience
Yes, your view is unpopular with Cavers...perhaps that should tell you something...
Peter Burgess said:It does seem that once some have run out of things to say on anything material, they switch to character assassination. Jane posted a few days ago how much better UKCaving had become over the last year. Some of you guys seem determined to prove her wrong.
Peter Burgess said:Yes it does. It taught me to take care who to have an intelligent discussion with, and who to keep at arms length. What it doesn't tell me, which I have learnt elsewhere, is never to be afraid to say what you mean and mean what you say.
This forum is not for the exclusive use of those who hold one opinion. It's value would be greatly diminished if it was one big cheer-leading fest for those who hold a majority view on anything. It does seem that some people cannot accept the idea that there might be people out there who don't agree with them. The intolerance expressed in the last 24 hours is a sad indictment of otherwise intelligent people, Alex excepted, I have to say . I hope I can claim to have not responded in kind to the bores.
It does seem that once some have run out of things to say on anything material, they switch to character assassination. Jane posted a few days ago how much better UKCaving had become over the last year. Some of you guys seem determined to prove her wrong.
I'd like to address Andrew's points, but why don't some of you lot exercise some brain cells and do it, post something intelligent for once.
It does seem that once some have run out of things to say on anything material, they switch to character assassination. Jane posted a few days ago how much better UKCaving had become over the last year. Some of you guys seem determined to prove her wrong.
I'd like to address Andrew's points, but why don't some of you lot exercise some brain cells and do it, post something intelligent for once.
It does seem that once some have run out of things to say on anything material, they switch to character assassination
jasonbirder said:It does seem that once some have run out of things to say on anything material, they switch to character assassination
It does seem that whenever you refer to "Character Assassination" or "Ad-Hominem" attacks...you are essentially referring to instances in which people point out you aren't what most people would call an "active caver" nor do you have an active interest (beyond the academic) in what people would consider major Caving Regions of the UK...
That's not a character assassination its a perfectly valid point in framing where your anti-access views come from...
droid said:Lets ask NewStuff a question:
Will CRoW apply to abandoned mines, or are they covered by other legislation that takes precedence.
NewStuff said:Anyway, I thought people were supposed to be refraining from the usual shenanigans that ensue in a CRoW thread?