• BCA Finances

    An informative discussion

    Recently there was long thread about the BCA. I can now post possible answers to some of the questions, such as "Why is the BCA still raising membership prices when there is a significant amount still left in its coffers?"

    Click here for more

Some good news on cave access

Blakethwaite

New member
Stuart Anderson said:
1 - By definition CRoW land is for the most part uncultivated.
That depends upon what you class as uncultivated. Large swathes of CRoW land are subject to very expensive moorland management schemes, for sporting purposes and for general ecological/conservation/blah-de-blah purposes. It certainly isn't 'wild' land.
 

Bottlebank

New member
Stuart Anderson said:
Bottlebank said:
Equally I'm not too concerned about the big landowners, it's the local farmers who are likely to take things personally.

We've been refused digging permission before where farmers have been annoyed other people have been digging without asking, one caver demanding his rights will be like a red rag to a bull.


1 - By definition CRoW land is for the most part uncultivated. Without bothering to look, I'll hazard a guess that it'll have very little impact on farmers (this is almost a repeat of what George North said). Any that are should be dealt with locally and with sympathy.

2 - Diggers going on to land and digging without permission has nothing to do with CRoW. Maybe it's the diggers causing the problems!!  :D

1. I've had a quick look, George did say that but it's not true - many, many Dales caves are on access land owned run by local farmers. Most Dales caves are on fells, not cultivated land (I assume you don't include fells as cultivated). No idea what the split is, someone may know.

I'm not biting on the second point and the numbers game with TheBitterEnd is getting off topic :)

Anyway, I've made my point so I'll shut up.
 

bograt

Active member
Be careful with your definitions, the CRoW act states "unimproved land", not "cultivated"
Although cultivated land is "improved", not all "improved" land is cultivated.
"unimproved land" is usually used for rough grazing, mainly sheep, it is likely that the farmers main objection to digging is the hazard to livestock.
The large estates maintain their "unimproved land" for a variety of reasons, not least being the lucrative business of game breeding for shooting, a knowledge of nesting and breeding patterns for these creatures should be a necessity for anyone using the fells on a regular basis.
 

georgenorth

Active member
Bottlebank said:
1. I've had a quick look, George did say that but it's not true - many, many Dales caves are on access land owned run by local farmers. Most Dales caves are on fells, not cultivated land (I assume you don't include fells as cultivated). No idea what the split is, someone may know....

Hi Tony, that's not what I said. I said that: "the majority of the caves with restricted access (i.e the ones requiring permits rather than just knocking on somebody's door) are owned by estates."
Do you disagree?
 

Bottlebank

New member
And I was going to shut up!

OK, very quickly. I agree that the majority with restricted access are owned by estates BUT I don't agree with Stuart's statement:

By definition CRoW land is for the most part uncultivated. Without bothering to look, I'll hazard a guess that it'll have very little impact on farmers (this is almost a repeat of what George North said). Any that are should be dealt with locally and with sympathy

Sorry, I was too quick to assume he was right about what you had said, and to be honest I'd read it the same way.

There are, as I'm sure you'll agree, a lot of caves on CRoW land which is owned by farmers, not estates. At the moment we generally have very good access and my worry is about those areas.
 

Stu

Active member
Bottlebank said:
And I was going to shut up!

OK, very quickly. I agree that the majority with restricted access are owned by estates BUT I don't agree with Stuart's statement:

By definition CRoW land is for the most part uncultivated. Without bothering to look, I'll hazard a guess that it'll have very little impact on farmers (this is almost a repeat of what George North said). Any that are should be dealt with locally and with sympathy

Sorry, I was too quick to assume he was right about what you had said, and to be honest I'd read it the same way.

There are, as I'm sure you'll agree, a lot of caves on CRoW land which is owned by farmers, not estates. At the moment we generally have very good access and my worry is about those areas.

Which bit don't you agree with?

That most CRoW land is uncultivated/unimproved/fell (point taken Blakethwaite)? It is, in the main. Look at a map.

That the impact will be, in the main (and by that I mean in the Dales in this case), to the estates? You've just agreed it is, haven't you?

There probably are a lot of caves on CRoW that is owned by farmers. Kingsdale would be a good area to look at (though I don't know who owns which bits). Mainly CRoW land. Lots of caves with access requiring no permits. Has there been much trouble in Kingsdale? What is there to worry about?  :confused: (And yes, I get it, forcing the CRoW hand on the estates - because that on the whole is what is really being discussed - might lead to poor relationships and digging being prohibited. But again, no one is saying that is to be the hand that will be played.)





 

Bottlebank

New member
I don't agree it'll have very little impact on farmers.

I haven't just agreed the impact will be in the main to the estates - I've agreed that most caves with restricted access are on estates which I think is what George actually said and I accept there is some benefit from CRoW on access on the estates where limits currently apply.

I don't agree the problem is from forcing CRoW on estates - I think they'll probably accept it.

My concern is for the very areas you've just mentioned, places like Kingsdale as you say, where upsetting farmers can damage what are presently reasonably good relations and there is nothing to be gained from CRoW - we already have all the access we need but in some areas we still need permission.

There are areas of Kingsdale where although no permit is needed permission is still required. Many people perhaps don't realise this or ignore it. these are the sort of areas where a problem is likely to arise.
 

badger

Active member
I have been told (rightly or wrongly) that the reason the owners and as this is as much to do with leck/caserton fell that the reason they the landowners wanted permit access was not to restrict cavers caving, but cars parked in/on the road around the entrance's,
So if under the CROW legislation cave's became unrestricted would this cause more cars to be parked and then therefore upset the farmers more?
and if then the caves became unrestricted and anyone caving could enter, is there anyway of telling the experience with in the group, mind you is that something that is checked any way.
and am I right in thinking most digging happens mid week, and sport caving on a weekend cant see that the two come into conflict.
or is the above just jibberish :confused:
 

Jon

Member
If parking is the issue then with the landowners permission couldn't CNCC / BCA organise a car park building day - gravel, manpower, hey presto, no cars parked on verges
 
Bottlebank said:
I know I've asked before but just what are people hoping to gain by CRoW?

I would gain access to some cracking Dales caving whenever I wanted to go, with whoever I wanted to go with. I wouldn't need the hoop jumping of joining a club, getting insurance, applying for permits...
As an ex club caver who curently doesn't want to be part of a club, it would give me the opportunity (if I felt so inclinced), to go and revisit some classics with a few mates.

Dan.
 

graham

New member
danthecavingman said:
Bottlebank said:
I know I've asked before but just what are people hoping to gain by CRoW?

I would gain access to some cracking Dales caving whenever I wanted to go, with whoever I wanted to go with. I wouldn't need the hoop jumping of joining a club, getting insurance, applying for permits...
As an ex club caver who curently doesn't want to be part of a club, it would give me the opportunity (if I felt so inclinced), to go and revisit some classics with a few mates.

Dan.

Even better, as a non-joiner, you wouldn't need to be bothered joining in with the helpful stuff like car park building, if that was deemed to be useful in caver/landowner relations.

All round winner.
 
graham said:
Even better, as a non-joiner, you wouldn't need to be bothered joining in with the helpful stuff like car park building, if that was deemed to be useful in caver/landowner relations.

All round winner.

That is one of the most Trolling comments anyone has ever posted to a reply I've made on any thread here on UK Caving. Why don't you crawl back into your hole Graham and f*** off!

Dan.
 

Peter Burgess

New member
What's wrong with being insured? It's a serious question - is it not a valuable thing to have, and not "just a hoop to jump through"?
 

cavermark

New member
danthecavingman said:
Bottlebank said:
I know I've asked before but just what are people hoping to gain by CRoW?

I would gain access to some cracking Dales caving whenever I wanted to go, with whoever I wanted to go with. I wouldn't need the hoop jumping of joining a club, getting insurance, applying for permits...
As an ex club caver who curently doesn't want to be part of a club, it would give me the opportunity (if I felt so inclinced), to go and revisit some classics with a few mates.

Dan.

You'll have to find some mates first Dan  :tease:
 
Peter Burgess said:
What's wrong with being insured?

Nothing Peter, I'm for it in principle but I thought it was done through being a member of a BCA affiliated club? I may be wrong in which case insurance would seem to be prudent.
If membership of the BCA allowed access via the CNCC then that would be great but individual members cannot apply for permits.

And Graham, last time I went walking on CROW Land I don't recall having to help build a carpark before I set off into the hills...

Dan.
 

graham

New member
danthecavingman said:
Why don't you crawl back into your hole Graham and f*** off!

'cos I'm pissed off with all these takers with a sense of entitlement a fucking mile wide Dan, that's why.

Have a nice day.
 

kay

Well-known member
danthecavingman said:
Peter Burgess said:
What's wrong with being insured?

Nothing Peter, I'm for it in principle but I thought it was done through being a member of a BCA affiliated club? I may be wrong in which case insurance would seem to be prudent.

Direct Individual Membership of BCA gives you PL insurance.

If membership of the BCA allowed access via the CNCC then that would be great but individual members cannot apply for permits.
 
I reproduce here,as a quote, one of my comments from yet another thread on CROW access:

danthecavingman said:
Blackholesun, Stu, NigR and others,

Finally, people are getting the essence of what I have been trying to get across.

None of this is about dismissing or undoing any of the sterling work that has been done in the past by Regional Access Councils or Cave Management Comittees to secure access to caves where, without their assistance, we would have had no access at all or very limited access at best.

It is about our rights as UK citizens under UK law, to exercise our right to 'Open-air Recreation' on access land, as defined by the CRoW Act.

I came into this debate to try and be objective and get people talking about the CRoW Act using 'real' background material, not speculation, hearsay, rumour etc. I hope I have gone some way to acheiving that.

My personal slant on this is as follows:
I am no longer a club member (btw I was a club caver for over 20 years). I cave very infrequently and do not want to be a part of the club scene anymore. I don't want caving insurance. I don't want to have to jump through all those hoops to get a permit to go caving in some of the finest caves in Britain.  What I want to do is to be able to turn up, for example, at Bull Pot Farm, with a couple of mates, get changed, walk across the fell and go caving. Simple as that.

What I don't want to do, in excercising that right is upset land owners and cause untold problems within the already well established status quo, whether that be right or wrong.

I am suggesting that the BCA and Regional Councils should acknowledge the exisitence of this cross section of the caving population, and try to support our right to want to go caving on access land, rather than the other way round.

I accept, that a lot of the work that is done securing and maintaining access, is voluntary or funded by subscriptions. I have no proposed solution as to how to get around this. I might suggest however that a big tin, for example on the gate at BPF and a notice along the lines of 'Access to the Caves on Leck and Casterton Fells is free to all under the CRoW Act. Natural England, The BCA and CNCC are working with the Land Owners to maintain this open access. Much of this work is voluntary, your considered donation will go some way to help us manage this ongoing access and ensure the preservation and conservation of these precious environments for future generations to enjoy.'. I would happily put my hand in my pocket....

Open access could be such a good thing if everyone were to pull together to sort it out. I understand that Land Owners may have concerns. Natural England may have concerns given that many caves and their approaches may well be SSSIs. These sorts of things do not stop Walkers, Climbers etc. enjoying their chosen past-time. To put it into perspective, try and imagine having to join a Walking Club, pay a subscription, pay for insurance etc, simply to be allowed to walk up your local hill....

"I fancy going for a walk up Mam Tor this afternoon...", "Sharp intake of breath, sucking through teeth... well, are you in a club?", "No, do you need to be in one?", "Well there's insurance for a start, you'll need that. And only recognised clubs can get a permit for Mam Tor. You'll need to get written permission six weeks in advance. Oh, and you can't go on Wednesdays. Or Fridays."

I fully subscribe to the fact that the situation for caving on Private or non-CRoW land is entirely different and if I wish to cave in those circumstances then Club membership, insurance, permits, keys or whatever may be a pre-requisite. I will not be caving in those areas.

Dan.

Can I suggest you read the above quote Graham and reconsider your previous responses?

Dan.
 

TheBitterEnd

Well-known member
:hug:

I'm just glad that this is a good news, moving forward thread and has managed to avoid the usual petty slanging match...


:kiss2:
 
Top