The BCA ballot is out

BCA Chair

Member
Just to clarify a few questions that have been going around on here and elsewhere;

All BCA members (CIMs, DIMs and Groups, the latter including regional councils, consistuent bodies and clubs), have a vote in this ballot under the existing two-house voting system. The individual members (CIMs and DIMs) vote in the House of Individuals, and the Groups in the House of Groups, and both must pass for a vote to be successful. For non-constitution related proposals, this must achieve >50% in both houses, but as this relates to the constitution, it must achieve >70% in both houses... a difficult thing to achieve indeed!

I believe someone commented at the AGM this year that the two houses have never voted in opposite ways (I have not fact-checked this).

All BCA members have received a ballot. For Individuals (CIMs and DIMs), this will have come by email, if you have provided the BCA with your email address (about 4000-4500 of our members). If we do not have your email address it will come by post (about 2000+ members). Bear in mind that the BCA relies on YOU as a member to keep your contact details up to date; we can only go off the details we are provided either by yourself directly (DIMs) or by your club (CIMs).

Check your junk/spam email folders for the ballot; it is very hard to email 4000+ people without this getting marked as spam.

The postal ballot (which is more or less identical to the email text) will be arriving no later than the middle of this coming week, and will include a ballot ID in exactly the same way as the email does, and will allow use of the online system. The postal ballot also includes a voting slip which can be used to cast your ballot by return post (at your own expense for postage).

If you receive a postal ballot this means the BCA does not have your email address. PLEASE considering providing the BCA with your email address upon 2020 membership renewal; the cost of posting 2000+ ballots (some of them internationally) is high and ultimately comes out of our member's pockets, as well as wiping out over a week of work for our Membership Administrator who is already extremely busy.

For Groups, we have email contact details for all but a few, so most groups will receive an email with their ballot ID; typically this will come to the club Secretary or whoever manages the club's BCA membership. Make sure your club Secretary has checked their junk/spam folder! Group ballots will be addressed to the Group (e.g. Dear British Caving Club), whereas individual ballots will be addressed to a specific person (e.g. Dear Joe Bloggs). The text is also slightly different to indicate whether that ballot is for a group or an individual.

How a club uses its ballot (i.e. whether this is left to discretion of just a few people who run the club, or the entire club committee, or whether the club wishes to enlist feedback from its entire membership) is no business of the BCA.

In response to the question from Nearlywhite. The voting system does contain a summary message from BCA Executive which may help. Essentially, the constitutional changes put forward are intended to remove the current two-house voting system, and instead implement a one-individual member-one-vote system. All proposals at BCA AGMs that currently go to a two-house system would in future go to an online ballot using an online voting system similar to the one use in this ballot. There would no longer be a group vote. The current two-house system is so entangled into the constitution, that a large number of constitutional changes are needed to remove it and implement the alternative, hence the complexity. Read the proposal carefully!

Matt Ewles
BCA Secretary


 

zomjon

Member
Point of interest, I've had my email and have duly voted, but my lad, as a junior member - aged 12 - should he have had a vote?
 

Jenny P

Active member
I tried to vote, having managed the trial runs successfully, but this time it wouldn't let me in.  (I'm sure this isn't a conspiracy - more likely to be my cock-up.)

So I have appealed to the returning officer for help and we'll see what happens now.

Must remind our Club Treasurer, who is our BCA Contact, to vote according to the Club's directions as agreed at our recent General Meeting, i.e. to remove the two-house voting system in favour of individual member ballot only.
 

BCA Chair

Member
We have heard from a few people struggling to get into the online system although the vast majority seem to be finding it to work fine.

Our webmaster believes the issues may be due to people copy-pasting the ballot ID but accidently including a space at the start of their copy-paste. He made an amendment this morning that means the system should disregard any spaces put in by accident, so Jenny, can you please try again? Try both the manual typing and copy-paste approach.

Our Returning Officer will no doubt put your enquiry in the direction of our Webmaster if this doesn't work.
 

Jenny P

Active member
BCA Secretary said:
We have heard from a few people struggling to get into the online system although the vast majority seem to be finding it to work fine.

Our webmaster believes the issues may be due to people copy-pasting the ballot ID but accidently including a space at the start of their copy-paste. He made an amendment this morning that means the system should disregard any spaces put in by accident, so Jenny, can you please try again? Try both the manual typing and copy-paste approach.

Our Returning Officer will no doubt put your enquiry in the direction of our Webmaster if this doesn't work.

Right, I tried again and it wouldn't let me in when I manually typed in the code (with no spaces) but DID let me in when I did a copy-and-paste.  So I have managed to cast my vote - thanks for the tip.  :)

Many thanks to all those involved in setting this up - must have taken loads of work so much appreciated.  Probabaly be easier next time we need to do it.

 

Jenny P

Active member
Jenny P said:
Must remind our Club Treasurer, who is our BCA Contact, to vote according to the Club's directions as agreed at our recent General Meeting, i.e. to remove the two-house voting system in favour of individual member ballot only.

Just done that too!
 

Jenny P

Active member
Ian Ball said:
If you are undecided can you abstain?

Don't see why not but it would be good to have a way of definitely registering an abstention to show that some didn't just ignore the vote but were genuinely undecided.  Note that, by standard convention, abstentions do not count when the votes are tallied, but it is worth while to know that there are people who were interested but undecided.
 

Pete K

Well-known member
Ian Ball said:
If you are undecided can you abstain?
Or even better, use the ample time between now and the end of the polling period to read up and arrive at a position which you are comfortable voting for.
 

cap n chris

Well-known member
Ian Ball said:
If the proposal doesn't get the 70% majority in both houses, where will that leave us?

I'd be amazed if it doesn't get 70% in both houses, unless, that is, one of the houses offers the views of cliques as though they are representative.
 

andrewmcleod

Well-known member
I would plead that any club considering voting against this motion check their voting record at the BCA AGM. If, like most BCA clubs, they never turn up to the AGM (quite reasonably given distance many clubs would have to travel to listen to 6+ hours of arguing), then what are they really losing by voting in favour? But they are gaining massively increased access for their members to democracy by allowing online voting. There's more to an AGM than constitutional amendments, and currently those decisions are taken by a tiny minority.
 

Ian Ball

Well-known member
:
mrodoc said:
One man one vote.

Is that an answer to zomjon about his child?

Why can't online voting be for both the house of individuals and that of groups?  Is it just a simpler process for the vote counting? Or to avoid conflict?






 

BCA Chair

Member
A few people have expressed concerns about having not received their ballot emails. Possible reasons:

(1) The BCA doesn't have your email address?

(2) It is in your spam/junk mail folder?

(3) A small proportion (a few percent) of the email ballots we sent out bounced back for a variety of reasons beyond our control, and all of those have been progressed to receive a postal ballot instead; which should come through at some point this coming week.

If we get into the w/c 18th November and you have received neither a postal or email ballot then please do get in touch and we will chase this up for you (returning-officer@british-caving.org.uk).
 

ahinde

New member
At a recent BCA council meeting there was a debate introduced by the Insurance Manager about "associate member" clubs of BCA. ie small multi activity clubs who's members do not take BCA caver insurance. This arose because BCA insurance needs to be a membership benefit for all members to keep within the law. ( most of these cavers hold BCA insurance through another caving club anyway) The price to pay for this status was that these clubs would not have a vote in the house of groups. This ballot has the opportunity to equalise the democratic deficit suffered by associate member clubs by doing away with the house of groups.
On another matter, it would be a worrying situation if the house of groups vote did not mirror the view of the  individual members ( CIM and DIM ). The vote at the AGM in June suggested that this outcome is quite possible.
We have had previous posts on "how representative are your club officers". I suppose we shall know soon enough. I remain optimistic that cavers and their reps will do the right thing and vote for these proposals.
 

NewStuff

New member
ahinde said:
On another matter, it would be a worrying situation if the house of groups vote did not mirror the view of the  individual members ( CIM and DIM ). The vote at the AGM in June suggested that this outcome is quite possible.

It's quite possible the individual members will vote one way, and the clubs another. I have no doubt there will be a few pig-headed people with responsibility for a clubs vote that don't care if members want to vote a certain way - They're voting the way they want to.

Should this happen, despite the stellar efforts of some, the BCA as we know it is not fit for purpose. No-one would have faith in the organisation after that, after all, what point is there in being a paying member of an organisation that lets a minority dictate? There would need to be a BCA 2.0, set up from the beginning with the members in mind, not pandering to the egotrips of a minority. Or nothing at all, and just go caving, which while ok for some (my club are fine with this), is obviously not ideal for all.
 

alastairgott

Well-known member
BCA Secretary said:
(3) A small proportion (a few percent) of the email ballots we sent out bounced back for a variety of reasons beyond our control, and all of those have been progressed to receive a postal ballot instead; which should come through at some point this coming week.

Also just found hotmail likes to put it in their ?clutter? folder.
Worth looking there too.
 
Top