nearlywhite said:
Robert Scott said:
Although I support the changes being made in the BCA, perhaps the BCA should look at the Rules and Primary Byelaws of either the CPC or the BPC as a way ahead, the current constitution and the so-called "Manual of Operations" seem to me to be difficult, arbitary and mysterious.
The main reason these things are mysterious are because many of the 'rules' are just conventions, they seem arbitrary because they made sense with a different secretary in a different political climate and they seem difficult because 'due process' in BCA's history was designed for it to achieve very little to retain the regions primacy.
It doesn't need more by-laws and paper, just simpler ones. I think the reason the BPC and CPC committees work well is the longevity of members in roles, the modest turnover and smaller size.
The Rules of the Clubs cover about 8 A4 pages and they define
1. The club?s aims & objectives
2. The committee and its powers
3. How it deals with the club?s assets
4. Who are the members and associates and their subscriptions
5. Removal of members.
6. General meetings
7. Auditing of accounts
8. Location of its registered office
The Primary Byelaws of the club cover 4 A4 pages
1. Who are the committee
2. Membership application
3. Meets
4. The obligations of the voluntary meet coordinators
5. Club tackle & its use
6. Club Cottage with reference to the club?s local byelaws.
7. Club Library with reference to the club?s local byelaws.
8. Club publications
9. Information Technology
10. Child Protection Policy
11. How Byelaws may be changed.
Presidence might help in arriving at decisions but the Rules and Primary Byelaws are paramount.