graham
New member
This particular copyright issue is one that I have discussed a number of times in a number of different contexts. I have, certainly, uploaded possibly still copyright material to the web (though my name is not Sergey Brin, or even Larry Page)and in cases such as this would have little compunction in doing so.
It is clear that the books are long out of print and similarly clear that they are not going to be republished. Thus the copyright as such is of very little, if any, monetary value indeed. Indeed much of the material has already been published elsewhere, in NC, and nobody got upset. It is is a fair bit, therefore, that even if the current copyright holder could be found, they would not have a problem. If they did, then the remedy is simple, you apologise and take the material down again. If they threatened to sue, then politely ask them what their financial losses have been. I'll be surprised if they amount to anything at all, how could they?
I have a scan of one book that we have not treated in this way* as there is someone who is claiming to hold the copyright. We don't believe them as there would, most certainly, be a market for a reprint and they have not produced one, but they are rather hard-line in their claims and we don't feel strongly enough about it to wish to end up in court.
*not a caving tome.
It is clear that the books are long out of print and similarly clear that they are not going to be republished. Thus the copyright as such is of very little, if any, monetary value indeed. Indeed much of the material has already been published elsewhere, in NC, and nobody got upset. It is is a fair bit, therefore, that even if the current copyright holder could be found, they would not have a problem. If they did, then the remedy is simple, you apologise and take the material down again. If they threatened to sue, then politely ask them what their financial losses have been. I'll be surprised if they amount to anything at all, how could they?
I have a scan of one book that we have not treated in this way* as there is someone who is claiming to hold the copyright. We don't believe them as there would, most certainly, be a market for a reprint and they have not produced one, but they are rather hard-line in their claims and we don't feel strongly enough about it to wish to end up in court.
*not a caving tome.