ChrisJC said:
Has glazed rope ever been tested?
many times and it SEEMS seems to have no influence (I am not going to be categorical). It is worth recalling that the main strength of a kernmantle rope is in the core, not the sheath. Also if you look at the construction of kenrmantle, you will see that there is roughly 40% longer length of yarn in the sheath per unit length of rope because of their helical turning compared to the yarns in the core. High speed camera work suggest the core goes first, see the disappearing bit in my avatar.
I have been further considering the heat conduction problem but reckon it is going to take several days of work to make a stab at solving the question, days I am afraid I currently don't have. I think part of the problem about glazing may well be due to the low heat conduction of dry nylon, so the energy being generated is not dissipating quickly enough thus causing higher temperatures in the surface region of the rope to glaze it. I think glazing probably occurs around nylon's melting point of 220C. On the other hand, in the descender, the metal's high heat conduction means the temperature remains much lower. But since generally people can't hold anything which is above 60C (don't try it unless you want to get a burn), one senses that the descender is extremely hot whilst in reality it is not hot enough to harm the nylon.
Roger W said:
So far, we have been thinking about heat generation and the rope getting glazed due to getting too hot. How about other aspects? What about mechanical damage to the rope? Is a wet (and muddy) rope more likely to suffer abrasion damage than a dry muddy rope? And then there's the issue of handleability...
I don't think I can answer Rodger's questions except to say one needs to think very carefully about the mode of heat generation. I keep getting different ideas about this and end up in a muddle. We can take the extreme cases where all the energy passes into the rope or into the descender but they are extremes. But how is the heat generated? Is it a simple friction of one surface running over another or is it the muddy particles in the rope gouging the metal? If it is the former, then my first thought (which is usually wrong) is that the energy ends up going into the higher heat conduction material, that is into the metal rather than the rope.
I can start to see a interesting project here with sand paper of different grades.