• CSCC Newsletter - May 2024

    Available now. Includes details of upcoming CSCC Annual General Meeting 10th May 2024

    Click here for more info

What's in your tackle bag?

nearlywhite

Active member
Mike Hopley said:
Just to give an idea of the size of my first-aid kit:

UbyC3dE.jpg


Not exactly a lot to carry, is it?

In addition to the peli case?

My point regarding the cannula is that establishing IV access in an emergency situations is really good if you have something to put in them - which you don't. And by the time rescue arrives it may have tissued anyway, especially if you're moving the casualty. I just don't see it being that  likely to be beneficial - though above ground yes.
And that a tension pneumothorax can be tricky to decompress - you may have to resort to the knife anyway.

The very low incidence of tension pneumothorax (including from broken ribs - it's more flail segment territory that causes these things) even from blunt thoracic trauma means that you're more likely to do more harm than good doing a needle thoracotomy. It's just very very unlikely to need to know on a caving trip.

Famous last words I suppose.

If push came to shove with the water issue you'd just drink the cave water - leptospirosis etc is far more preferable to haemodynamic collapse. The purification stuff is something I'd take abroad but not the UK.

I may be wrong, time for some BCRC guys to slap me down
 

Mike Hopley

New member
nearlywhite said:
In addition to the peli case?

No. It either goes in a daren drum (if we are carrying one as a group, which then also holds stuff like a storm shelter, and various bits & bobs that people want kept dry), or it goes in my small SRT pod bag (as the kit itself is watertight and quite robust, notice the O-ring seal?).

On expeditions, where the caving was considerably more serious/remote, each person carried a first-aid kit like this, and kept it on them in their personal bag.


My point regarding the cannula is that establishing IV access in an emergency situations is really good if you have something to put in them - which you don't. And by the time rescue arrives it may have tissued anyway, especially if you're moving the casualty.

I'm aware of that, but it's still potentially better than nothing. And you will not be moving a casualty in that state -- certainly not once they have been moved out of danger and you've started treating them.

But regardless, I wouldn't be in a tearing rush to stick a needle in their veins. There's a pretty narrow range of circumstances where it might be appropriate. It's mostly there for the pneumothorax, and even so I consider it one of the least useful/practical items in the kit.


And that a tension pneumothorax can be tricky to decompress - you may have to resort to the knife anyway.

You really shouldn't, and if you do it's going to be horrible beyond imagining. That is a line I'm not prepared to cross -- it's causing serious harm, with no justification for expecting it will actually help (at least, not from the training I've had, which I'm going to take more seriously than Random Caver on Forum).

Even if you are prepared to do that (expect them to fight you!), why the hell would you start with the knife, and not the needle?


The very low incidence of tension pneumothorax (including from broken ribs - it's more flail segment territory that causes these things) even from blunt thoracic trauma means that you're more likely to do more harm than good doing a needle thoracotomy.

I'd be very reluctant to do it, but it's better than letting them die. Obviously you would wait until it's really bloody serious -- so they've probably collapsed, they have an obviously deviated trachea, severe breathing difficulties and most likely a sense of impending doom.

And yes, you have to make sure you don't stab them in the heart, so stay outside the nipple line. And you still need consent, while they are conscious.


If push came to shove with the water issue you'd just drink the cave water - leptospirosis etc is far more preferable to haemodynamic collapse. The purification stuff is something I'd take abroad but not the UK.

Sure, just about anything is preferable to haemodynamic collapse. But why so melodramatic? Dehydration is bad; occasionally water is nasty; chlorine tabs make it better. And again, they take up bugger all space in the kit.
 

nearlywhite

Active member
And thus my point is made.

Needle thoracotomies are tricky when you're dealing with big people. They have a very significant morbidity. And if you think a blade is horrible beyond imagining then you should think twice about the damage you could do with a needle.

I think it's a dangerous precedent to carry equipment for first aid that includes a tension pneumothorax. Because you might actually use it. And I'd be more worried of getting wrong and making things much worse.

Have a read:
http://emj.bmj.com/content/22/1/8.long

Sorry to go on about it but I feel pretty strongly 'as a random caver' (a rather amusing ad hominem in this case) that we don't advertise the 'sexy' trauma conditions with a simple fix that are really rare. Really rare. Because someone really well intentioned, even with experience can really mess things up.

That's why I mention the blade - a tension pneumothorax is so bad they won't be able to fight you, you will think they're dead and this will be a real last ditch attempt.

Very somber.

My dismissal of the chlorine tablets is because although they take weigh bugger all it falls under the adage of the straw that broke the camals back. Not that your first aid kit is that unruly. - however it is perfectly fine not to carry them unless you're properly remote.
 

Mike Hopley

New member
Needle thoracotomies are tricky when you're dealing with big people. They have a very significant morbidity.

I'm aware of that -- that's why current recommendations suggest a larger/longer needle. Can't remember the exact dimensions off the top of my head, but I did check when building my kit.

Besides, slimmer people are sometimes worth saving too, right? ;)


And if you think a blade is horrible beyond imagining then you should think twice about the damage you could do with a needle.

I've had my shoulder capsule penetrated with a really big F-off needle, and that was fairly unpleasant, but I put up with it. I would not have allowed them to hack at me with a caving knife!


I think it's a dangerous precedent to carry equipment for first aid that includes a tension pneumothorax. Because you might actually use it. And I'd be more worried of getting wrong and making things much worse.

Good for you, don't carry one then. I think you're quite wrong, and will continue to carry mine.


Sorry to go on about it but I feel pretty strongly 'as a random caver' (a rather amusing ad hominem in this case)

It's not ad hominem. My point is that forum conversation can never be sufficient to overrule qualified training, especially when the advice is "take a knife to their chest".

You might be the world-expert in this subject for all I know, but this is not an appropriate context for me to receive training.


Not that your first aid kit is that unruly. - however it is perfectly fine not to carry them unless you're properly remote.

I agree. I could quite happily leave them out.
 

alastairgott

Well-known member
From Memory, I don't even think Cave rescue carry syringes in their general first aid kit. If they exist in any of the kits, then they will be in the Team doctors kits, and therefore only used with full knowledge of the different methods of use (and the best implement to use in each situation).

I like many of the people on this forum would trust NearlyWhite's judgement on the tool to use if it came to a life or death situation.

If you are unsure of the many different ways of dealing with this long named medical thingybob, then I personally would be wary of letting you near me with a syringe. But then if I'm lying out cold on the floor and you want to play acupuncture with me, then I guess I wouldn't have a choice.
 
When I first started caving I carried a little personal kit with some candles, first aid, spare contacts etc and our club rules state we should take a first aid kit on trips but...these days I rarely do.  I have a spare light on my helmet, a bivi bag in my chest pocket and I cave with good mates.  I might consider sticking a bandage and some gauze in my helmet perhaps but it is good to not have to carry much.
 

ZombieCake

Well-known member
An ice axe to fight monsters.
Where do you go caving?!?  Black tourmaline is also good for warding of evil spirits, a bit of garlic & holy water is useful too - after all you never know what those bats will change into.

Anyway more normal gear is a couple of lights, bivvy bag, chocolate as standard and then whatever is needed for the trip with a bit of rope and bottle of water normally near the top of the list.  Also sherpas for unnecessarily cumbersome and bulky camera and measuring gear!
 

alastairgott

Well-known member
ZombieCake said:
An ice axe to fight monsters.
Where do you go caving?!?

Wherever, but we always make sure we throw 5 times as much rope down the entrance just so we can all abseil together.

We keep finding Rusty pitons in the roof and having our entrance blocked by rockfalls.
 

Peregrina

Member
alastairgott said:
From Memory, I don't even think Cave rescue carry syringes in their general first aid kit. [...]

I like many of the people on this forum would trust NearlyWhite's judgement on the tool to use if it came to a life or death situation.

If you are unsure of the many different ways of dealing with this long named medical thingybob, then I personally would be wary of letting you near me with a syringe. But then if I'm lying out cold on the floor and you want to play acupuncture with me, then I guess I wouldn't have a choice.

Presumably the general DCRO first aid kits are for use by rescuers with only basic first aid training, so the fact they don't include needles doesn't mean much. It looks like Mike's done a fairly advanced first aid course focused on some more serious techniques than are usually covered on a weekend first aid course in the UK e.g. injections, wound stapling. (I looked it up.)

Obviously the opinion of someone with relevant expertise like nearlywhite carries a lot of weight, but I was told when I did a long first aid course in the US (SOLO 80 hr Wilderness First Responder) that many doctors would shudder at some of the things they would teach laypeople, and that when they're teaching first aid for very remote environments they will teach skills that we were *only* being taught for remote scenarios like being stuck in a canyon, days from help.

IIRC on my course they said "we won't teach you to deal with a tension pneumothorax, but if you're in the middle of nowhere and your mate is going to die, you might as well give it a go".

Al, you've said you'd be wary of letting him near you with a cannula - but I'd much rather that than a caving knife...

Personally there are other things I'd put in a first aid kit (e.g. irrigation syringe and a big catheter for clearing vomit from the mouth/cleaning wounds), but Mike's already said it's the least essential thing in his kit.

I'm not commenting on the pneumothorax issue as I don't know enough about it, but wilderness medicine courses like the one I've done are often designed by doctors specialising in remote medicine so I am happy to do what I've been trained to do - even though I know that might not impress some urban doctors.
 

nearlywhite

Active member
Just to clarify the advice is not 'take a knife to their chest'. The vast majority of cavers should definitely ignore this conversation.

The point is that I'm not sure you apprieciate (or read the article regarding a tension pneumothorax I posted) quite how dangerous it is to stick a needle there and a lot of people misdiagnose normal pathology as tensions in hospital. The difference between the knife and the needle isn't that I'm advising anyone to be gung ho with a knife, it's that I'm stressing it's relatively easy to be gung ho with a needle, with fatal consequences. It's on the same plane of consideration, for a rare and hard to call condition (if you've never seen it). I genuinely think you (or anyone else) would more likely injure/kill people than save their life in this very specific scenario.

That article is quite good at making the point - the 'ad hominem' accusation is perhaps a little strong but as you were discrediting the argument based on it being made by someone anonymously it stands. So I gave you a small sample of the literature and am prepared to leave it at that as there's no counter evidence being presented to my opinion.

Now lets get the thread back on track and discuss the merits of different brands of chocolate/weapons to kill cave monsters; I'm a snickers/handjammer person myself.
 

ZombieCake

Well-known member
Now lets get the thread back on track and discuss the merits of different brands of chocolate/weapons to kill cave monsters
OK, this could explain Mr Gott's issue described above re: collapsing entrances.  http://lovecraft.wikia.com/wiki/Chthonian  Not sure even a +1 titanium ice axe with cool logos on would be much help here.  The more sugary brands of chocolate (as opposed to trendy high % cocoa ones) may provide an extra energy boost to run like merry hell though.
 

andrewmcleod

Well-known member
A laminated survey and description...

How many callouts are due to people just getting lost?

(rather more than there are tension pneumothoraxes, I would guess)
 

Kenilworth

New member
andrewmc said:
A laminated survey and description...

How many callouts are due to people just getting lost?

(rather more than there are tension pneumothoraxes, I would guess)

I dislike having a survey along unless I need it to reach a particular project area of an unfamiliar cave. I prefer to pay attention.
 
Top