cap n chris
Well-known member
ianball11 said:I'm concerned over the heat generated in a stop.
What thickness rope do you routinely use?
ianball11 said:I'm concerned over the heat generated in a stop.
Fulk said:Fair point ? I have one rope with a 'crispy' surface, but wouldn't a Simple also get hot in the same situation?
Joe90 said:If the Stop/Simple is hot enough to glaze a rope, then surely stopping will burn one section of rope far worse then if you slide over it briefly?
Not arguing either way here by the way just stating a point.
Personally I use a Stop but I and have an ID for anything bigger, I have not used a Simple before.
Pitlamp said:Has wetting the rope gone out of fashion nowadays?
Amy said:Proper heat dissipation is a reason for a rack - they do a good job of it and wont burn through the rope on long rappels.
To be honest especially if the trip is anything over 100-150ft I doubt a trip leader here would even let you bring one.
1m/sec is considered appropriate speed of decent. Rope only glazes if you go too fast for the rack you are using. Do you not wear gloves there? Here you wear leather rappel gloves. And keep in mind there are a HUGE variety of them not just the 5bar Petzl with the red bars I see sold on the cavegear supplier's sites there (I realize you must have other versions but that's the one I see sold on sites there). The type of bars (design, thickness, composition of the material...), the length of the frame, etc all play into the equation.Ouan said:Amy said:Proper heat dissipation is a reason for a rack - they do a good job of it and wont burn through the rope on long rappels.
From personal experience racks can get hot enough to burn flesh and will glaze rope if you go fast enough.
The type of bars (design, thickness, composition of the material...), the length of the frame, etc all play into the equation.
Joe90 said:using a Simple you still have the rope in the stronger hand. Allowing you to abseil much further before getting a sore hand/wrist
jarvist said:The type of bars (design, thickness, composition of the material...), the length of the frame, etc all play into the equation.
It's all simple energy conservation - you must turn your potential (m*g*h) into heat (mass_of_heated_object * Specific Heat Capacity * Temperature Rise). For a short, quick drop (adiabatic limit), all this energy ends up as hot metalwork.
Racks don't have magic powers, they just weigh more and thus have greater heat capacity.
paul said:the heat isn't spread through the remaining bars as you would expect despite the relatively larger amount of metal to absorb the heat when compared to Bobbin-type descenders.
cap 'n chris said:Joe90 said:using a Simple you still have the rope in the stronger hand. Allowing you to abseil much further before getting a sore hand/wrist
Not debating the accuracy or relevance of this but just adding that when using a Simple (because it has no "dead man's handle") it might be a wise(r) plan to have both hands on the feeding rope just in case you take a significant unexpected hit to your controlling arm.
jarvist said:My understanding is that the motivation for a rack on a long hang is not just the increased thermal mass, but the ability to vary friction as you go down to compensate for the weight of the rope below varying. On a >60m hang on a bobbin, you end up having to haul yourself down the top half. It's really odd, you feel like you're on an upside down prussic setup, except taking the 'steps' is almost free.
Yes most of the friction (and wear) is on the top two bars. We have special thick (they are almost solid!) bars for this which helps, and grooves will keep the rope traveling in the center rather than wiggling about and running against the frame. You have to remember we have a HUGE range of racks and bars here not just the Petzl 5bar no hyperbar standard thing I see for sale on all your caving sites. I'm sure some others trickle over but not sure how much ya'all are aware of just the variety. Basically quick run-down of benifits (and why we use) racks:paul said:It seems that most heat is generated on the first or second bars (as may be indicated by the fact that these are worn at a faster rate) but because the bars are relatively isolated from each other, the heat isn't spread through the remaining bars as you would expect despite the relatively larger amount of metal to absorb the heat when compared to Bobbin-type descenders.
* found it:
See NYLON HIGHWAY NO. 9 - MAY 1978, Page 6 via http://www.caves.org/section/vertical/nhindex0115.html