Huge,
A bit might depend on precisely what you mean by point 4.
Some lights/inserts (such as one of the customduo ones) have what I'd call 'programmed mixing', where there are some predetermined mixes of spot/flood beams chosen to cover what the maker decides are likely-wanted blends for various situations.
If you're talking about what I'd call on-the-fly mixing, ('I want that level of flood with this level of spot') I'm not sure what options there are other than some of the things I (Bisun) make.
(Though saying that might be tempting fate - I never know what John will come out with next.)
On-the-fly mixing can be more complicated in use, since there needs to be a way to control the beams independently and at the same time.
Programmed mixes have the advantage that control can be simplified in some ways (such as making it easy for the light to be rapidly turned off).
With my P51 and the new (Duo) Flexitwin (at least when running in P51-like modes), I can select at will from far more beam blends than would be practical in a programmed-mixing light, but that does come at the expense of having a certain base-level of complexity* in the control, and having a light which can take a few seconds to turn off.
Personally, after >8 years of using an on-the-fly twin beam light, I'd hate to have to use a programmed light (even if I was doing the programming), but I can see how some people might really get on with one, especially if the blends they have been given are largely what they want, or if, like the Scurion, they can edit what the programmed settings are.
(*though to be fair to myself, I only have to know how to control a beam, and I don't have to remember what arbitrary order someone chose to lay out various mode blends in)
A bit might depend on precisely what you mean by point 4.
Some lights/inserts (such as one of the customduo ones) have what I'd call 'programmed mixing', where there are some predetermined mixes of spot/flood beams chosen to cover what the maker decides are likely-wanted blends for various situations.
If you're talking about what I'd call on-the-fly mixing, ('I want that level of flood with this level of spot') I'm not sure what options there are other than some of the things I (Bisun) make.
(Though saying that might be tempting fate - I never know what John will come out with next.)
On-the-fly mixing can be more complicated in use, since there needs to be a way to control the beams independently and at the same time.
Programmed mixes have the advantage that control can be simplified in some ways (such as making it easy for the light to be rapidly turned off).
With my P51 and the new (Duo) Flexitwin (at least when running in P51-like modes), I can select at will from far more beam blends than would be practical in a programmed-mixing light, but that does come at the expense of having a certain base-level of complexity* in the control, and having a light which can take a few seconds to turn off.
Personally, after >8 years of using an on-the-fly twin beam light, I'd hate to have to use a programmed light (even if I was doing the programming), but I can see how some people might really get on with one, especially if the blends they have been given are largely what they want, or if, like the Scurion, they can edit what the programmed settings are.
(*though to be fair to myself, I only have to know how to control a beam, and I don't have to remember what arbitrary order someone chose to lay out various mode blends in)