• Descent 302 is published on 15 February and it will soon be on its way to our subscribers.

    In the newsdesk, read a review of the underground events at Kendal Mountain Festival, plus tales of cannibalism and the Cavefish Asteroid.

    In regional news, we have three new connections in Ogof Agen Allwedd, a report on the iron mines of Anjou, an extension to Big Sink Cave in the Forest of Dean, a new dig in Yorkshire's Marble Steps Pot, student parties, an obituary for Tony Boycott, a tight find in the Peak District and a discovery in County Kerry with extensive formations.

    Click here for details of this edition

Cave Rescue and Insurance in Wales.

on an active call out any caver, officially involved be they rescue team or co-opted are covered by the tasking police forces insurance.

Any accident claim would be made on the police insurance in the first instance.
 
I think (but I don't know for certain, because they were never interested in talking to me) that the MREW cover provides a certain amount of personal injury cover which would pay out to a rescuer in the event that they were injured on a rescue.

This covers a different risk to the third party liability cover which would pay out in the event that the rescuers injured someone else and which is part of the BCA membership insurance contribution.

I don't know if the police policy includes any personal injury cover.

Generally I would expect personal injury cover to be optional and a matter of individual choice. Lack of it is certainly not a reason to be excluding people from participating in rescues.

The ability to co-opt people with specialist skills into a cave rescue team when required is essential. Cave rescue is not all about shiny bits of rope hardware.
 
Alex said:
Does this have similar implications for the CRO who use co-opted cavers, or are they on a different insurance scheme? In UWFRA, we don't really have a non-member volunteer list anymore.

As far as I know CRO had a meeting around the 16th of February to iron out the cavers list and the issues in this thread. I don't know what the result of this meeting was, as I wasn't at it.

Also forgive me if i'm wrong, but I got the impression that the cave rescue members of Swaledale(or it could have been UWFRA) were also CRO, as then they could train with CRO and meet this new insurance thing, but get called out to their local shouts.
 
82f93fbcbbbc6f4fe02852537c33649f.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
This is what was just posted in my club Facebook page for those wondering about MCR and the insurance.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
During the fatal Curtain Pot rescue in June last year it was pointed out to those of us on the cavers list that we weren't insured.  We all continued regardless.  Before and since then CRO have been working hard to find a solution to the issue which they now seem to have done.  However for some other rescue organisations to comply they will have to make far bigger changes to their structures I reckon.
 
I think I was once told (so treat this with skepticism) that the police _pay_ for some element of the insurance, but it is provided by a private insurance company via MREW. Some of this definitely relates to personal accident rather than liability cover; some teams have decided it is not acceptable to have people carrying out potentially dangerous rescues without personal accident cover and that is a point of view I understand. While individual cavers might not care, it's a team decision to accept help or not.
 
During the fatal Curtain Pot rescue in June last year it was pointed out to those of us on the cavers list that we weren't insured.  We all continued regardless.  Before and since then CRO have been working hard to find a solution to the issue which they now seem to have done.  However for some other rescue organisations to comply they will have to make far bigger changes to their structures I reckon.

Good point, I forgot that was said and could have answered my own question. I assumed for that shout I would be insured because I am with UWFRA anyway (not like it would have made a difference to me), but as it's a different team's shout. I must admit I am not 100% sure how the insurance works in that situation, I would go out on a limb and say 99% chance I was insured being a full team member, although a different team.
 
So from what I can make out from the above:

CRO last June were telling ordinary cavers that they were not insured on the Curtain Pot incident.
SMWCRT have now said ordinary cavers are not insured on incidents
MCR have said no change to the status quo.

So my question is what is the status quo for incidents where MCR is involved?
 
Don't quote me on it John, but I believe MCR insurance runs until October,  so co-opted volunteers are covered by this until then.

In addition,  the police provide 3rd party cover to anyone helping in a rescue.
 
They are all insured third party, the question is whether personal accident applies now (& whether either will on renewal)...
 
John, you might have more response if you ask on the MCR facebook page.

Rumour is they are setting up a database of some sort.
 
Back
Top