martinm
New member
Brains said:The CCC executive get a vote of thanks for intervening in an act of anti-caver behaviour by some of its members?
Agree totally.
Brains said:The CCC executive get a vote of thanks for intervening in an act of anti-caver behaviour by some of its members?
droid said:Seems to me that there's a fundamental lack of trust between the Access group and CCC executive.
The Access group have come up with a solution to a problem; CCC don't appear to recognise a problem and reject the solution.
Have CCC been involved in any negotiations with the landowner? Do they know ALL the facts/problems?
Often, in solving a problem, a certain amount of pragmatism and compromise is needed. Something that is noticeably lacking in the 'Free Access for All' lobby.
Rhys said:[quote author=mmilner ] I will talk to the CCC C&A officer about things when I get back.
droid said:SNIP.............
Often, in solving a problem, a certain amount of pragmatism and compromise is needed. Something that is noticeably lacking in the 'Free Access for All' lobby.
Simon Wilson said:droid said:SNIP.............
Often, in solving a problem, a certain amount of pragmatism and compromise is needed. Something that is noticeably lacking in the 'Free Access for All' lobby.
There is no "'Free Access for All' lobby". We almost certainly have the vast majority who want to know what the law is and for all to stay within the law - that is all there is to it. You are deliberately misrepresenting the situation.
Brains said:For the record, are these entrances on CRoW land or not?
bograt said:Isn't there some rule or other about interfering with natural features on CRoW land?