jasonbirder
Member
This has been done to death a thousand times...but you're essentiallt saying...
There are landowners who are happy (or at least accept) Walkers and Climbers having a Legal right to use access land...AND have good caver relations and are currently happy to allow cavers to go in Caves on their Land...that will be unhappy if the existing access they voluntarily grant to cavers is put on the same legal footing as the rights climbers and walkers currently enjoy...
Do that sound realistic?
More realistic...Landowners that don't currently like cavers...don't like the idea of CRoW access to Caves
Landowners with good Caver relations...won't give a flying f*ck about it...
Oh...Landowners that have been told by access bodies and/or clubs that CRoW access for Cavers is the end of the world...might currently be a little bit windy about it...wonder how/why that could have happened!
There are landowners who are happy (or at least accept) Walkers and Climbers having a Legal right to use access land...AND have good caver relations and are currently happy to allow cavers to go in Caves on their Land...that will be unhappy if the existing access they voluntarily grant to cavers is put on the same legal footing as the rights climbers and walkers currently enjoy...
Do that sound realistic?
More realistic...Landowners that don't currently like cavers...don't like the idea of CRoW access to Caves
Landowners with good Caver relations...won't give a flying f*ck about it...
Oh...Landowners that have been told by access bodies and/or clubs that CRoW access for Cavers is the end of the world...might currently be a little bit windy about it...wonder how/why that could have happened!