• CSCC Newsletter - May 2024

    Available now. Includes details of upcoming CSCC Annual General Meeting 10th May 2024

    Click here for more info

Message for Rhychydwr1.

bubba

Administrator
The Wiki is an information repository, not a place for your personal adverts for items for sale.

Stop posting such adverts or I'll have to suspend your access.  :thumbsdown:
 

bubba

Administrator
Ok, since you seem to be on a mission to advertise your books, I have blocked you for one day.

For fucks sake, the wiki IS NOT a for sale board.
 

graham

New member
bubba said:
Ok, since you seem to be on a mission to advertise your books, I have blocked you for one day.

For fucks sake, the wiki IS NOT a for sale board.

As far as he is concerned, everything is a for sale board. ;)
 

rhychydwr1

Active member
It is not often that I am speechless, but I am today.  These book that I am listing are useful reference works.  If you want to go caving in any of these area you will first need to know where the cave is.  Wiki  is not going to much use if the cave locations are kept secret.

Comments welcome.
 

bubba

Administrator
The idea is that the wiki grows into an encyclopedia of useful information.

We do not adverts with prices and your email address all over them.

If you want to flesh out the wiki with information about the caves, then please do so without including for sale adverts.

If you want to create a section that has guidebook information, then again, you are happy to list your guide, but not to include "for sale" style ads. If you have a website that sells one of your guides, then you can link to that.

This is one of your entries:

THE CAVES OF CARMARTHEN - Part 3 in the Series "Limestone and caves of South Wales” by Tony Oldham. vi + 65 pp, 39 surveys, location maps etc.
In the long out of print 1967 edition of 'Caves in Wales and the Marches' only 13 caves were described and 10 sites listed by National Grid Reference only.
This book describes in much greater detail over 100 sites of speleological interest.
An introduction in Welsh, a caving code, cave rescue hints and Cave Conservation are some of the many topics included.
New A4 edition Revised April 2003.
SB £7.50
available from:
tonyfoldham@hotmail.com

This is not an acceptable style of entry. This is an advert.

I run ukb on a non-commercial basis - I don't want adverts on the wiki.

There is a for-sale board on the forum, which you are very familiar with. Please keep that sort of thing for there.
 

Peter Burgess

New member
Ok you requested comments.

What you posted were useful references to publications that provide relevant information. However, when I buy a book which includes useful references, they do not normally include prices, and details of who to contact to buy them. That turns a reference into an advertisement. If someone wants to get a copy of the book you mention, Tony Oldham's books are well enough known for anyone to be able to find out how to get a copy and how much it costs. Ask any good caving retailer.

I'm with bubba on this one.

 

graham

New member
Haven't looked at the Wiki in detail (Wikis tend to make my computer fall over) but I have to say that Bubba is right and rhychydwr1 is most certainly wrong in this instance.
 

bubba

Administrator
For future reference, here is what I would consider more appropriate:

Instead of:

THE CAVES OF CARMARTHEN - Part 3 in the Series "Limestone and caves of South Wales” by Tony Oldham. vi + 65 pp, 39 surveys, location maps etc.
In the long out of print 1967 edition of 'Caves in Wales and the Marches' only 13 caves were described and 10 sites listed by National Grid Reference only.
This book describes in much greater detail over 100 sites of speleological interest.
An introduction in Welsh, a caving code, cave rescue hints and Cave Conservation are some of the many topics included.
New A4 edition Revised April 2003.
SB £7.50
available from:
tonyfoldham@hotmail.com

An appropriate entry might be:
- create a sub-page called "guidebooks" under the appropriate area page.
- Then put something like this:

Oldham, Tony. "The Caves of Camarthen" (2003)

That is a correct bibliography style entry.
 

rhychydwr1

Active member
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.

Unable to deliver message to the following recipients, due to being unable to
connect successfully to the destination mail server.

      bubba's email

From: Tony Oldham <tonyfoldham@hotmail.com>
To: bubba's email

Subject: RE: New Personal Message: Re: Wiki
Sent: 18 October 2006 08:34:01
Dear Mike

There was a further problem.  Whilst I was wallowing in Wiki I could not access my  Hotmail, so your messages went unread.  I was not trying to ignore you.  Usually I only access Hotmail twice a day as I use the computer in the library and that is all I am allowed.



Cheers - Tony Oldham
Duncavin
1 Riverside Mews
CARDIGAN
SA43 1DH
United Kingdom

http://www.sat.dundee.ac.uk/~arb/speleo/guides.html
http://www.showcaves.com
http://www.mike.munro.cwc.net/mining/tony_o/tonyo_hp.htm
http://www.showcaves.com/foreign/Big/F003-003.jpg


 
E

emgee

Guest
Cave_Troll said:
maybe an ISBN number and an amazon link

Certainly the ISBN should be acceptable. Personally I'd like a few lines of description of the contents too. Linking to the likes of Amazon strikes me as totally unacceptable.
 

bubba

Administrator
It's ok rhychydwr1, I know it was just a communication breakdown. The main reason I blocked your account was because I'd seen that you weren't online on ukb, so an email/PM wouldn't have got to you anyway. If my mailserver rejected your message then I might have been doing a reboot or something. I did come across a bit OTT on here though, so I apologise for that ;)

On another note, it's a bad idea to post your email address here - it'll get harvested by spam-bots and you'll just end up with more crap in your mailbox. It's better to ask people to PM you or email you through the site. That way, your email address isn't on display.

emgee said:
Certainly the ISBN should be acceptable. Personally I'd like a few lines of description of the contents too. Linking to the likes of Amazon strikes me as totally unacceptable.
The ISBN is perfect.

I'm not convinced amazon links should be there either. I know amazon is a superb bookseller, but it's not the only way people buy books - it's better to give them the choice.

I've seen some links on there that instead of taking you to Amazon, they take you to a listings page of online booksellers. I think this is better, because it allows people to add thier preferred retailer to the list, either as an external link or an address/phone no.

I've thought about setting up an amazon affiliate account so that people (if they want) can use that to buy their preferred book and help donate to the running costs of ukb at the same time. I'm not trying to force people to do that so it would just be an option alongside a regular amazon link. If that seems wrong to anyone then plz discuss.
 

RobinGriffiths

Well-known member
I think the idea for the publication list would be for each link to have a mini review or where appropriate historical notes. I put the Amazon links in as a quick and dirty fix to some content to encourage addition to the list. As with a suggestion elsewhere, external links in the publication article could point to amazon or whatever.


Robin
 
C

cucc Paul

Guest
I dont think any one would mind so much if you linked to amazon and had an affiliate account with them too much Bubba, amazon is a good website and you have to try and make the ends meet if this is an easy way thats not too intrusive all the better... The other thing we found is once our wiki got going we needed a bigger bandwidth quota and more web space.
 
E

emgee

Guest
cucc Paul said:
I dont think any one would mind so much if you linked to amazon and had an affiliate account with them too much Bubba, amazon is a good website and you have to try and make the ends meet if this is an easy way thats not too intrusive all the better... The other thing we found is once our wiki got going we needed a bigger bandwidth quota and more web space.

You think wrong. At least one person would.
 
Top