Peter Burgess
New member
On the basis of what has beed posted here, then even if you think it is inappropriate to sympathise with Mr Moorhouse, then at least try to empathise with him, and if that is not possible, then say nothing.
RobinGriffiths said:There was a 'lock this thread' request a few days ago. I've been away since then and have only just had a chance to read recent posts. I was a bit queasy about the way things were going when I posted my previous response, and had my initial doubts re-confirmed when catching up. I don't know this guy, will probably never meet him, but it isn't on to hatchet job someone on a public forum like this. If someone has any reason to think he's a risk to himself or others, then presumably there's someone in 'authority' who can be approached.
I'll not shoot you down. It's a sensible question.martinr said:I will probably be shot down in flames fo saying this....
Has anyone considered contacting this guy with a view to getting him to join a caving club to get some proper training? Rather than just slagging him off.
Peter Burgess said:Turner, do you personally know anyone who has either written or talked about self-harm or suicide?
Unfortunately there isn't such an authority. It's not illegal to make false claims about your leadership skills/experience. It's not illegal to say that you're part of a non-existent rescue team.Turner said:but at the end of the day this is a serious matter, and this chap needs reporting to the authorities as its clear he is and is going to put people in danger.
Turner said:Peter Burgess said:Turner, do you personally know anyone who has either written or talked about self-harm or suicide?
yes but what significance does this have with what i just said?
Peter Burgess said:Turner said:Peter Burgess said:Turner, do you personally know anyone who has either written or talked about self-harm or suicide?
yes but what significance does this have with what i just said?
Because, (and I suppose it very much depends on the troubled individual), I would never try to second guess the motives of someone who had, for fear of aggravating the situation. Because I am not an expert, and wouldn't pretend to be one. That's all.
Newbie2013 said:Andrew Moorhouse is still the liar and conman that is suggested on the Internet forums however is now using a different name...
I met Andrew Gilleard through a dating website, first impressions are that he is a gentleman. Andrew told me that he was an active member of search and rescue as well as an outwards bounds instructor. He also stated that he was an active reserve in the army, often working with the civilian police. The skills that this man claims to have is unbelievable (I know that now..) he slowly fed me a pack of lies about who he is and what he does. As I have now found out Andrew Moorhouse is his real name and he is a compulsive liar and cannot be trusted. He has not got any outdoor qualifications but does come across as knowing what he is doing - but he doesn't. What his aim is I'm not sure but there is an element of financial gain. If you are female and says he loves you, wants to marry you and hasn't felt that way since his fianc? died - well he's said it all before. There is so much more I could say about this man however all I'm going to say is avoid this man.
JessopSmythe said:It's an archive page from January 2003, which would mean he was 16/17.
The bloke's enough of an arse to provide plenty of material without us taking the piss out of the bits that could be right!