Bob Smith
Member
the deadline, as expressed on a progress chart. The progress for Galileo is best checked on their website a not wikipedia.Rhys said:Bob Smith said:...probably going to slide to the right.
eh?
the deadline, as expressed on a progress chart. The progress for Galileo is best checked on their website a not wikipedia.Rhys said:Bob Smith said:...probably going to slide to the right.
eh?
The original post mentioned the RA, so as walkers they would (or you'd like to think they would) have maps with them, or GPS. Anyone with a map or GPS would be able to provide a grid-ref quite easily but not postcodes.Roger W said:Come to that, how many people know the OS grid reference of wherever they might happen to be and in need of an ambulance or whatever?
Roger W said:"Follow the path up the hill from Trow Gill and look for a bloody great hole in the ground. You can't miss it..."
[/quote
You can, you know ...
Every year Ramblers volunteers organise around 30,000 led walks. The vast majority occur without incident. However, we have had
some worrying reports from Walk Leaders stating that when something has occurred on a walk our volunteers have been unable to effectively communicate the location of the injured person. This has been because the Ambulance Trust contacted could not understand the grid reference given as a location.
If an emergency does occur when you are out walking you may need to ask for a different emergency service depending on where you are. If you are somewhere where an ambulance can reach you such as a country lane or roadside - you need to call 999 and ask for the ambulance. If your somewhere where an ambulance can?t reach you, a hillside or forest for example, you need to call 999 and ask for the police.
But as has been mentioned above, postcodes can potentially cover a fair sized area and are not accurate on their own - they need extra information such as house name/number etc, which is useless when you're not near habitation. Admittedly grid-refs can be vague, depending on how accurately they are provided, but in certain situations are better than a postcode.AndyF said:Shouldn't the campaign be to get outdoor people to be aware of their postcode when setting out, or to carry GPS's with that very postcode software on it?
We are the ones putting themselves in harms way, its up to us to take resposibility for that..
AndyF said:Shouldn't the campaign be to get outdoor people to be aware of their postcode when setting out, or to carry GPS's with that very postcode software on it?
We are the ones putting themselves in harms way, its up to us to take resposibility for that..
Roger W said:I'm sure AndyF's tongue was firmly in his cheek when he posted that.
I hope so, at any rate...
AndyF said:Roger W said:I'm sure AndyF's tongue was firmly in his cheek when he posted that.
I hope so, at any rate...
I'm glad someone realised that...!!!
There was a valid point made earlier though, is how would the police attending an RTA communicate their location to the ambulance service. Do they go through a central service or are the in touch locally with the ambulance service who have"local knowledge"...?
I would imagine that the Emergency Services communicate directly with each other and have no problems sorting out locations based on road names, etc.
Why not scrap postcodes, which are crap and change with grid references, teach all children to read a map and how to arrive at a grid reference.darren said:Rant, rant, campaign campaign. The ramblers do like a good rant followed by a bit of a campaign.
It all comes down to economics. What is the cost of installing a nation-wide emergency system that accepts GPS co-ordinates and I suppose OS co-ordinates if they are different. Compared with the cost of a ambulance. Once this is known someone (not me) can do a cost benefit analysis of the choice between a a co-ordinate based system and extra ambulances.
I'm only guessing but I would expect putting an extra ambulance into some under resourced ambulance station would save more lives than the co-ordinate system.
Please let me know if I am again ruining a good argument ( albeit a five minute one) with common sense and logic.