• Tony is on holiday until Saturday 20th

    This means that the Travelling Shop will be out of action for a week and any inquiries sent to him won't be picked up until he's back.

    In the meantime the rest of the Starless River team will be hard at work ensuring online orders are posted out to you all. Thanks everyone.

    Click here for details

  • Help us work out the future of the Inglesport Café

    We've been trading since 1977 and next year will be our 50th anniversary.

    The café has been part of that for a long time, running quietly in the background for years, and we don't think it always gets the credit it deserves as a genuine community hub. ⁠But we need to be straight with you: the café is under real pressure, and we’re not sure of the best path forward.....

    Click here to add your thoughts

Swildons names

Pitlamp

Well-known member
I'm just trying to clarify names to make sure we get these right in an important piece of text.

Is it "Sump 7" or "Sump VII" or "Sump Seven"?

Also, is the passage preceding this sump "Swildons Six" or "Swildons  6"?

We've consulted various incarnations of Mendip caving guides and the CDG Somerset Sump Index and met with inconsistencies.

Would welcome the thoughts of folk who know about these things; thanks.
 
I'm not sure on the numbering or naming convention relating to the actual number itself but the passage between sump 6 and 7 is know as Swildons 7.

Everyone who visits Swildons visits Swildons 1 by the same logic...

Swildons 1
Sump 1
Swildons 2
Sump 2
Etc

Similarly in Stoke Lane Slocker and possibly other Mendip caves
 
Except in wookey, where there are openings all over the place & they weren't found in order...
 
Sorry, I should have explained; I'm interested in the correct original names (given by discoverers) for these places is Swildons.
 
Historically the sumps/passage in Swildon's used Roman numerals (which is what you'll find on early surveys), also for Stoke Lane as well.

Modern convention is to use Arabic numerals.  Its a matter of choice whether to use numerals or write the number alphanumerically.  Sometimes interchangeably and inconsistently.
 
Duncan Price said:
Historically the sumps/passage in Swildon's used Roman numerals (which is what you'll find on early surveys), also for Stoke Lane as well.

I notice that Wooding was inconsistent in the ICDG reports: "This sump was passed - tight and about 10' long, to Swildons IX" and "Sump 6a of the 6 complex..."
 
Yes - there is some inconsistency but if you want to keep to the traditional historical names it should be Swildon's Seven and Sump VII.  See the Swildon's Hole book, Swildon's Hole 100 Years of Exploration, MU5 and the Swildon's Hole surveys.

NB. The passage preceeding Sump VII is Swildon's Seven not Swildon's Six (which is before Sump VI). 
 
This is proving helpful - thanks to those who have posted above so far (especially Ali for correcting my schoolboy error!  :-[ )
 
Back
Top