G
Geog Student
Guest
Cheers for all the info, i am interested in the Bagshaw site, as Graham rightly points out anything capped with calcite is of limited use due to the difficulty to date, it is much simpler with active sediments as you know when you are starting from. Although there sounds as if there is plenty to work with in this cave which is excellent. A couple of question regarding sediment size and structure:
1. I am assume in the flood events referred to the previous floods sediment isn't flushed away and only a limited amount of resuspension occurs.
2. Are laminae visible throughout the structure?
In response to Graham's questions 13/02/09:
1. Annual laminae are not a prerequisite i use the term loosely to mean that the sediments haven't been to heavily 'mixed' i.e. there are distinct layers from particular point in time and they are in chronological height order, i.e. oldest at the bottom youngest at the top and everything inbetween.
2. Unfortunately only an active one will do as the chronological controls on a relic are just too weak, (unless i can be convinced of a case otherwise, however there are major dating problems which i would have to clear with my supervisor also things getting into the millennia are just too old as the dating cost and accuracy are unfortunately beyond my means, well my stingy departmental analytics budget!!)
3. This is a tricky one to postulate over really, ideally speaking a totally undisturbed deposit would be great. However, if there is an area of disturbance and it can be accurately dated and explained it may actually be of some benefit, but ideally not.
4. Sand, mud, slit clay only i am afraid to say, just because i am more interested in the chemicals within the sediment rather that the sediment itself, the idea is to carry out chemical analysis as a representation of deposition of trace chemicals at the ground surface.
Thanks everyone for your suggestion so far it has been a great help any more information would be great in light of my response. I intend to speak to my tutor at the end of the week and put the most appropriate ideas forward. This will lead to a site visit in the next few weeks to check suitability. Thanks again.
1. I am assume in the flood events referred to the previous floods sediment isn't flushed away and only a limited amount of resuspension occurs.
2. Are laminae visible throughout the structure?
In response to Graham's questions 13/02/09:
1. Annual laminae are not a prerequisite i use the term loosely to mean that the sediments haven't been to heavily 'mixed' i.e. there are distinct layers from particular point in time and they are in chronological height order, i.e. oldest at the bottom youngest at the top and everything inbetween.
2. Unfortunately only an active one will do as the chronological controls on a relic are just too weak, (unless i can be convinced of a case otherwise, however there are major dating problems which i would have to clear with my supervisor also things getting into the millennia are just too old as the dating cost and accuracy are unfortunately beyond my means, well my stingy departmental analytics budget!!)
3. This is a tricky one to postulate over really, ideally speaking a totally undisturbed deposit would be great. However, if there is an area of disturbance and it can be accurately dated and explained it may actually be of some benefit, but ideally not.
4. Sand, mud, slit clay only i am afraid to say, just because i am more interested in the chemicals within the sediment rather that the sediment itself, the idea is to carry out chemical analysis as a representation of deposition of trace chemicals at the ground surface.
Thanks everyone for your suggestion so far it has been a great help any more information would be great in light of my response. I intend to speak to my tutor at the end of the week and put the most appropriate ideas forward. This will lead to a site visit in the next few weeks to check suitability. Thanks again.